From the category archives:

SM Global Report

I visited South Africa last October, bringing with me a perspective shaped by my deep respect for Nelson Mandela and the long walk to freedom he took with his African National Congress [ANC].

But times change and so do the natures of political parties once installed in office. The history of continental Africa is filled with freedom struggles that resulted in new tyrannies.

I was in South Africa to address a student body mostly comprised of young adults who were born after Mandela took office and were coming of age at a time when he had left public service to spend his twilight years with family.

I was very much surprised to discover that most people I talked with were deeply opposed to the ANC. I repeatedly heard charges of pervasive corruption. The best-known social media activist  uses the Twitter handle “PigSpotter,” to report where ANC police set up checkpoints to pull over motorists and shake them down for bribes.

Most of the people I met in Capetown supported the Democratic Alliance, the opposition party that has taken over the Western Cape province under the leadership of an ex-investigative reporter named Helen Zille. While the party she leads is far from overtaking the ANC nationwide, Capetown is a formidable and important stronghold.

Zille rose to attention while working for the Rand Daily Mail in the late 1970s, where she exposed the facts behind the death of anti-apartheid activist Steve Biko, who died in police custody. Police said it was caused by a hunger strike. Zille uncovered that he had been beaten and tortured by police. She became active in anti-apartheid groups including Black Sash, a white women’s resistance group of the 1970s.

In 2004 she was elected to Parliament, then Capetown mayor where she was credited with making inroads against crime, drug abuse and unemployment. She now serves as Premier of the Western Cape, a position equal to being governor of a large US state.

Additionally, she heads the Democratic Alliance and is thus the face of the opposition party.

Zille’s interest to me and the Pioneers of Social Media book project is that she and the DA seem to be using social media in a great many ways. This interview was conducted coincidentally, simultaneous to the recent events in Egypt. making the effectiveness of social media against oppressive governments particularly relevant.

Q1. Can you give me an objective sense of the differences between the ANC and the DA? What percent of the country backs the DA? Why is it so much more popular in the Western Cape than elsewhere in So Africa?

The Democratic Alliance has a vision of a prosperous South Africa in which each person has the opportunity, and the wherewithal, to reach their full potential.

We understand that South Africa’s hard won democracy enjoins us all to work day and night to see South Africa succeed as a country. We see a bright future for South Africa, where a person’s race is not a determinant of his or her success.

The ANC is the party that led the struggle against Apartheid. It has a proud history. Sadly though, it has now completely lost its moral compass, and has no vision for the future. The ANC, like so many former liberation-movements, has become an investment club for the well-connected elite. The DA is now gaining support in all communities across the country, commanding almost 17% nationally, and 52% in the Western Cape, where we now govern.
Q2. When, how and why did the DA start using social media? How has it evolved?

The DA began using social media in late 2008, when we underwent a rebranding exercise. We began by re-engineering our web presence, making it more engaging, interesting and interactive. At about this time we also launched our social media presence, originally as a way to recruit volunteers. However, it has grown so exponentially that it is now a very effective way to communicate with our supporters, and for them to communicate with us.
Q3. Did social media play a role in the DA’s Western Cape victories? How so? How would the DA use it moving forward.

The 2009 National Election saw an unprecedented interest from young people. This is undoubtedly linked to the evolution of political communication in South Africa to the point where it now intersects (in the case of the DA) with the youth’s primary means of staying connected: Facebook, Twitter, and mobile internet.
Q4 What social media tools do you personally use? How about other DA representatives? Does the DA use MXiT [So. Africa's most popular social network]?

I use Facebook and Twitter. Other DA representatives use Facebook, Twitter, personal blogs, and Youtube extensively. We don’t currently make use MXit, but we have recently launched a mobile social media platform aimed at young people called Motribe.

Q5 What is the DA’s fundamental strategy with social media? How will it help you gain greater support among So Africans.

Our presence on social media is very important to us. It allows us to communicate directly with our supporters, sometimes several times a day, without the filter of the partisan media. It allows South Africans, especially young people, to understand more clearly what the DA is doing to build South Africa’s future.

Q6 To become the majority party, DA must gain the support of the huge percentage of the population which is not affluent, educated and connected, but also those who are impoverished and may not even have cellphone connection. Can social media help?

There are now more than 50 million mobile phones in South Africa. More people in South Africa access the internet via mobile phones than via computers. So yes, social media can help us to reach poorer South Africans who may not have ‘traditional’ access to the internet.

Q7 One DA detractor tells me that the DA [like most Americans in  politics] uses social media to try to get the word out and campaign contributions in. The DA, this person argues, really doesn’t engage with constituents all the time, and doesn’t use it as a listening tool. How would you respond?

We have not yet made any use of our social media platform as a means of raising funds. We use it purely as a means of communication. While it is difficult, for obvious reasons, to respond directly and publicly to the more than 160 000 people that follow us on Facebook and Twitter, we do take careful note of all that is said and posted – and where appropriate, we do respond privately.


Q8 Do you see a role for social media in mass education issues such as health? I refer to So. Africa’s alarmingly high incidence of AIDS.

Yes, absolutely. Social media is now the primary method of contact among South Africa’s youth. There are huge opportunities for a wide range of positive educational messages to be broadcast via this medium. Health related messages are important, and the One Love campaign used social media successfully.

Q9 In view of recent events in Egypt, can social media play a role in regime change in So Africa?

Social media influences politics by making people more informed of what is happening, when it happens. Governments can no longer keep information hidden from the public. It is the triumph of accountability over secrecy and suppression. In that sense, yes, social media can assist regime change.l

A couple of weeks back I posted a description of my SM Global Report, my ongoing series of blog-based interviews with people who have used social media in innovative ways in their lives and in work.

Timothy Post commented that one of the reasons people didn’t seem to know what the SM Global Report was all about is that the name seemed pretty generic, and I thought he might have a pretty good point.

I am definitely not locked into the current name. This continuing series started in 2005. Interviews, mostly in the form of Q&A have been the spine of Global Neighbourhoods. I have conducted over 425 of them with people in over 25 countries.

The series has had several names. It has been Naked Conversation notebook, Twitterville notebook, and SAP Global Survey when that company was my sponsor.

I’m thinking of changing the name to Social Media Pioneers. It seems to me, that I have overwhelmingly focused on people who have stretched the envelope of social media; have taken it into places where it never had been.

I’ve been reading and reviewing the body of them [Just click on the SM Global Report Category in the sidebar-- if you are interested]. I didn’t plan and structure it, but so far, almost everyone I’ve covered has been a real ground breaker in the following categories:

  • Founding Fathers
  • The enterprise
  • Small business & home office
  • Government
  • Religion
  • Nonprofits and social causes
  • Health
  • Braided journalism
  • Monitoring, measurement & Analytics
  • Social changers

I’ll be honest, I’ve been looking and poking and thinking that I could update and expand on what I already have and make a pretty decent self-published book. I have a ton of material that already fits.

This is not an announcement for a new book–just thinking out loud.

But my question to you is this: Would it make a better blog & book title if I called these interviews Social Media Pioneers–Folk who journeyed where no one has gone, or something like that?

And one other thing, I am constantly looking for people who have used social media to stretch the envelope at work and in life. If you know someone, please email me at shelisrael1@gmail.com

In 2006, Robert Scoble and I published Naked Conversations, a book about why businesses should blog. It began with the statement, “We live in a time when most people don’t trust big companies.”  We went on to argue, that our largest complaint with big organizations is that while they shovel messages at us all the time, they just don’t listen to customers, prospects or critics.

Shortly after publication, a now-famous event took place remembered as “Dell Hell.” Essentially, a celebrity blogger complained about the awful treatment he was receiving from Dell Computer company Then other people posted similar complaints. Starting as isolated complaints, a grassroots movement took hold; and as people coagulated in focus against Dell, the movement amplified. Forbes magazine the bloggers as an “unwashed mob, lighting torches and attacking in the night.

I was a part of that unwashed mob. I had been a Dell customer for 15 years. I had made a fair amount of money by investing in Dell stock. But when keys started falling of the keypad of my six-month-old Inspiron laptop, Dell support advised me to buy a new computer. I became mad as Hell. For me, the blog noise was not part of a mob designed to get Dell, so much as a peer support group for those who had suffered poor company support.

Then something amazing happened. Dell demonstrated that it had started listening. It started a blog and endured a flood of hostile and abusive commentary. At some point, Lionel Menchaca, the principal blogger uttered words that you just don’t often hear from enterprises spoespeople.

He said Dell was sorry.

A collective sigh seemed to resonate across what was then called the blogosphere. People became surprisingly polite toward Dell and have remained so for the most part. The company was among the first to start engaging, in two-way conversations with customers and from the perspective of social media proponents became a poster child for how to do it right.

But that was then and this is now. Dell Hell has become an old story. In social media years, 2006 is comparative roughly to the second Ice Age

in Earth years. The question this SM Global Report attempts to answer is: what has Dell done lately?

The answer is a whole lot. The company has turned social media listening into a strategic imperative. At the heart of this strategy is an impressive investment into a war room-like facility called the Dell Listening Command Center. From there, it monitors and average of 22,000 conversations related to Dell every day, then distributes the most relevant of them to the few people who should know among the Dell team of about 100,000 employees.

The Listening Center went live a few days before Christmas 2010, when company founder Michael Dell ceremoniously flipped the switch and a room full of computer screens suddenly went live.

No one person can take credit for this long-planned, complex project. But Manish Mehta, Dell’s vice president for social media and community deserves much of it. The former Three Mile Island engineer has been at Dell for the last 16 years. He’s responsible for establishing Dell’s strategies, global programs, best practices, policies and measurement of social media across the company.

He chairs Dell’s Social Media and Community Leadership Council involving each of Dell’s businesses and departments across the company. I have known Manish for a while and find him consistently candid and responsive, characteristics that I do not always experience when talking to enterprise executives.

I asked Manish to fill me in on the command center.

1. Most companies still use social media primarily to broadcast messages. A few actually look at engagement. Now Dell is shifting emphasis to listening. Can you explain to me the business advantage to listening?

Five years ago when we really began to focus our efforts on social media we discovered that one of the biggest opportunities in this space was to listen.

Listen first.

You will learn where your customers are and what they are saying and interested in.  In that respect, listening, learning and then engaging is at the core of what we have been up to for the past 5 years in social media.

I think what you are now seeing is not so much a shift to listening.  Rather what you see Dell doing is operationalizing listening and scaling it across the fabric of the company so that Dell team members across various functions and business units are hearing and seeing what our customers say every day.

Being close to the customer enables us to hear our fans; we gain a first-hand understanding about what they love about Dell’s technology, products and services–and, we can hear instantaneously, across the Web what our customers wish we would do more of, as well as learn about where we need to improve.  This kind of listening is global, robust and covers all our businesses (Consumer, Small and Medium Business, Large Enterprise and Public Sector and Services) and various functions within the businesses and across them.

2. When and how did the idea for a Dell Listening Command Center start? How did it evolve?

The Social Media Listening Command Center began its evolution about a year ago.  We started embedding social media use across the entire company. We gave Dell team members the tools to listen, learn and engage, directly, and from there it evolved.

Three key points became clear:

First, even as you democratize social media use across an organization, there is still a need to continue to have a global, aggregate or corporate perspective.

Second, customer conversations might well be relevant to more than just one business unit.  Perhaps a Bluetooth driver needs updating, for example.  That could cross various product lines and business units.  In these cases, we wanted to be sure we would be able to have that broader perspective and ability to coordinate, rather than have five different groups trying to solve for the same issue.

Third, the Social Media Listening Command Center also serves as a focal point to ensure we are following up on matters that we learn about from listening. For example, some conversations on the web may not need to be followed up today, but they should still be tracked to ensure we get to that information as soon as we can.

3. Can you give me some sense of the investment in time, financial and human resources involved in creating the listening center–not counting your obvious savings in hardware and cloud computing costs?

It is pretty difficult to size “listening” when you think that we trained more than 5,000 Dell team members in the last half of 2010 to use social media and listening tools as part of their job.

The Social Media Listening Command Center, while physically in Austin today, is staffed 24×7 globally covering 11 languages.  Our global team members around the world use the same tools as the Social Media Listening and Command center in Austin, except they have the tools on their desktops.  I suspect, in the future, various parts of the world will have their own Social Media Listening Command Center.

4. Radian6 has received lots of credit as your monitoring partner.  But what other social media tools are you using? I’m particularly interested in the analytics you are extracting.

Radian6 is our partner on this front.  We have an ongoing relationship with Radian6 which also involves development programs to keep innovating and fine tuning our listening.

The aggregation of information and the insights from conversations across the Web about Dell are still evolving. Much of this is instrumented and developed in house with various data sources and coupled with the listening data. Current analytics cover such matters as:

  • · topics and subject of conversations
  • · sentiment
  • · share of voice/volume of commentary
  • · geography
  • · trending topics, sentiment, geographies

Within the Social Media Listening Command Center we can display that information in a variety of visual ways, formats and combinations

5. Can you walk me through just how this Center works, from when a Dell issue is “heard,” to how you distribute it to the right person or persons?

First, let’s be clear.  Not all social media conversations are about issues and the Social Media Listening Command Center is about more than just issues.

For example, there can be conversations by Dell fans and long-time loyal customers.  There can be customer conversations that are about suggestions to improve our business.  These are important customers to connect with and further establish Dell’s direct relationships.

We like to share their stories across our businesses, thank them, and understand more about their loyalty to Dell.  We want to hear firsthand how our technology products and services gave them the power to do more or what else they want us to do.  As you likely know, we have also connected with some of these folks, brought them to Austin and held Customer Advisory Days listening to more about what they had to say on the Web.

There are also customers looking for support and help.  @Dellcares on Twitter and the Social Outreach Services (SOS) team are listening for customers who need help across the social Web.  They are embedded within the business and using the listening tools to follow up with customers.  They don’t rely on the Social Media Listening and Command Center, nor are they assigned tasks from the Command Center.  However, they do work closely together and compare notes on topics to ensure we are tracking and following up on the most critical issues.

Ideally, we strive to have the Dell team members equipped and responsible for matters impacting their customers and business first.

The Social Media Listening Command Center is focused on issues that may be percolating over a period of time; ensuring we have the right teams on any matters that need attention; they are ensuring we have the business processes and procedures to continue scaling our listening efforts; they make sure we are following up on action items; and finally they provide the macro perspective and trend analyses around what listening tells every part of our business, every day

6. How much of the process is automated and how much human review is involved?

The searches are all automated.  The tracking and coordination is all about people and business processes that enable us to further scale the use of social media.

7. Other than response, how else are those messages used by Dell?

The aggregation of the information, location, sentiment across 22,000 conversations per day informs various business analytics.  For example, we are garnering insight and real time conversation information about our brand, sentiment, who is talking about us and why, the matters that need help, early warnings on quality issues, suggestions for changes to our products, services and business processes, and places where we need to do better.  We hear it all and share the trends across Dell’s  businesses and executive teams

8. If other companies follow your thought leadership, will you be willing to help them–other than selling servers and services?

Yes of course.  We met, or had phone calls, with more than half a dozen other companies over the last couple months sharing best practices.  Frankly, we always look forward to these opportunities because we also learn from others.  That learning is critical to us as we seek to forge ahead in new ways that will continue the journey of realizing strategic business benefits of listening, learning and engaging using social media.

Last night I had the pleasure of watching my friend Tom Foremeski give pragmatic, wise tips to the San Francisco Blog Club on the finer points of researching, writing and posting content. It was based on his 25 years of writing for the Financial Times and now publishing his own Silicon Valley Watcher blog.

Afterwards we chatted outside the venue and I asked him if I could do a Social Media Global Report [SM Global Report] on him explaining his concept that every company is a media company. He immediately agreed, then paused for a second and asked:

“What is the SM Global Report?”

Earlier, he advised bloggers to repeat what they have previously said, partly because your audiences change. Sometimes what you say doesn’t resonate and then you try again later and it does.

Tom’s a pretty good friend and my feathers got a little ruffled because the SM Global Report has been part of my personal brand since before my first book, Naked Conversations was published. I know Tom reads me, at least occasionally, but it became instantly clear that I needed to repeat myself and explain what the SM Global Report is all about.

First, it is the longest and deepest category on this blog.

Since 2005, I have been interviewing people about how they use social media in work and in life. I have intentionally made the list diverse. My last SM Global Report was with Scott Monty the head of social media at Ford Motor Co. The one before that was with the director of e-government in Colombia. I have interviewed dissidents who post at great risk in Lebanon, China and Egypt. I’ve talked with high school students; Fortune 50 CEOs and board members, nonprofit strategists and so on. I even had fun interviewing a podcasting priest.

My site slogan is “following social media wherever it takes me,” and the SM Global Report is the vehicle by which I travel on this blog. So far, I have interviewed over 400 people in more than 25 countries and have posted over 850,000 words in the reports.

They have been the spine of my research for Naked Conversations and Twitterville, my two hardcover books, for The Conversational Corporation, my Dow Jones ebook and for Blurring Boundaries, I book project I started and abandoned last year. When these projects start, the Global Reports are renamed, into promotional categories as Twitterville Notebook. For a while, SAP sponsored my efforts and I renamed the series the SAP Global Report.

I am always looking for people who have moved the needle in social media with ideas, strategies, tactics that change business, knowledge, life and approaches to institutions. Upcoming interviews will be with the head of Dell’s social media program because of the groundbreaking work he is speerheading by making listening a strategic corporate tool. Next, will be the head of So. Africa’s opposition party who is using social media to reach young and future voters.

I want to interview Tom, not because he’s my friend, but because I think his idea that “every company is a media company” is a really big idea that could influence what you do with social media in your work.

Now, when someone asks me what the SM Global Report is, I can send them a link to this post.

[Scott Monty [r] shows Ford Motors CEO Alan Mulally a blog comment during recent auto show.]

I knew Scott Monty when he was still in Boston. When I first heard he was leaving the home of our beloved Boston Celtics for Ford Motor Co., I kind of felt sorry for the guy.

He was leaving a very cool place to join a company whose glory days seemed to be long ago and far away. His having to go to Ford seemed to indicate a great paucity for senior level social media jobs in the global enterprise.

Shortly before Scott was hired, I had visited Ford on assignment for Fast Company TV and had left very much underwhelmed by the automaker’s grasp of social media.

The shock is that all this happened in 2008, just a tad over two years ago.

Ford Motors is now writing, blogging, tweeting, and recording one of the great industrial turnaround stories of all times. Senior players are leaving Toyota to join Ford. Their cars are getting all sorts of awards for engineering, sustainability, design and sales.

Of course, Scott Monty did not accomplish all that. But what he did acheve is a brilliant braiding of social media into an ever-expanding part of Ford, its culture and it’s relationships with customers.

He talks about all this with a fair amount of modesty, but I’ll let him take up the story from here.

You began as a medical student. From there, you became a marketing consultant before centering your interest in social media. What drove you along that course, and why?

Let me take you back just a little further.

As an undergrad, I was a Classics major studying Greek and Roman civilization, art, culture, architecture, sports, drama and history. While I planned to go to medical school, I first wanted  to study some subjects other than science, since I anticipated having a lifetime of science before me.

I had no idea that I’d wind up handling digital communications for one of the world’s best-recognized brands.

As it turned out, I enjoyed the humanities more than science, but didn’t want to give up on my aspiration, so I began the first year of medical school, to try it out.

I quickly realized that while I had the personality for medicine, my patience for applying myself to the deeply scientific side was lacking.

Rather than give up on what I began, I investigated other options and discovered a dual-degree program, where I could get a master’s degree in medical science concurrently with an MBA.

With the growing importance of managed care, I figured I’d be a double threat–or at least have enough knowledge on both sides to be dangerous.

While I was working on both degrees, I concurrently worked part-time as a writer for the US. Dept. of Veterans Affairs. I was on the team that wrote the report on the transformation of the VA health care system under the proposed Clinton plan, and as a speechwriter. This writing assignment, in addition to the numerous essays I had written as a Classics major and my thesis for the master’s program, continued to influence and hone my skills as a writer – a critical element for a professional communicator.

To make a long story even longer, managed care didn’t turn out to be what I expected, and after working in it for a few years, I left to join a biotech and medical device consulting firm, doing corporate development work.

Our clients had promising early-stage technology and we found larger companies and structured the deals to bring that technology to the market.

When the tragic events of September 11 occurred, the financial markets were particularly uncertain and it meant that firms hoarded their cash, leaving our small shop absent from the revenue we needed to continue. The owner eventually shuttered our division.

Luckily, I found a home at a business-to-business marketing and advertising firm that specialized in health sciences and high tech clients. My background led me to participate in many of the key medical accounts, but I was also exposed to some of the high tech work.

In this new role, I became aware of this new topic at professional conferences – one called “social media.”

I had been personally blogging since 2000, and social media struck personal and professional chords. I began writing The Social Media Marketing Blog in mid-2006 in an effort to get some of my thoughts down and to use it as something of a laboratory and sounding board for our clients.

Since B2B marketing runs 18-to-24 months behind B2C in terms of trends, I was ahead of my time when it came to convincing clients to try the new social tools. I subsequently left and joined a consultancy that specialized in helping large companies understand and adopt social media strategies.

Looking back at my classical education, I can’t help but acknowledge that it played a significant role in how I came to do what I’m doing. As I mentioned, the writing component was a crucial one. For anyone wishing to have a career in communications, I’d recommend honing your writing skills. You need to effectively express yourself. Writing is a muscle that always needs to be exercised.

Ford has become one of the great turnaround stories of recent years. But when you chose to join Ford, most of us did not see that coming.  What did you see that made you elect to uproot yourself and your family and join an enterprise that had very few achievements in social media?

Probably like many people in late 2007 – particularly those on the coasts or in the technology space, Ford was simply not on my radar. I didn’t know enough about the company to jump at the opportunity.

But when I took the time to research it a bit, looking at the management team and their philosophy (One Team. One Plan. One Goal. One Ford) and the product cadence that the company had so heavily invested in (thanks to taking out a $26 billion loan in 2006), not to mention the raw talent and passion of everyone I spoke with I saw a huge potential. I had predicted that by 2010, there would be a convergence of Ford’s product lineup and the development of the social media industry.

Not everyone recognized that. I was asked, “Why aren’t you going to a successful company like Toyota?” While we may smirk at that question now, the fact is that in early 2008, it was a much different industry. I knew that Ford’s fortunes had to turn, and I thought I’d rather be part of a success story than simply maintaining an existing one. And since the senior leadership at Ford had created the position for which I was interviewing, I knew that I’d have their.

There’s no question that leaving Boston after 20 years was difficult. But the experience has been nothing less than exhilarating. It has helped me grow professionally and given me the chance to serve an American and global icon. In retrospect, my only regret is that I didn’t do it sooner.

Ford is a very big enterprise. Just what do you do there? Who do you work with and answer to at Ford?

It is indeed.

We make vehicles in 70 locations on six continents and have over 160,000 employees. A far cry from working for a five-person shop just before I left Boston!

My position sits within Corporate Communications, overseen by Ray Day, our vice president. Ray reports directly to our CEO Alan Mulally, giving a senior seat at the table and and involving us in strategic decisions.

It also means that we’re the central clearinghouse for company information and news, putting us in a unique position to clarify, debate, inform, educate and otherwise communicate with the outside world, whether they’re journalists, customers, investors, dealers or the public.

My responsibilities are many. I manage our digital publishing team, which is responsible for a number of weekly internal e-newsletters. My team maintains Ford’s media site.

Our group also develops the company’s social media strategy. I oversee the team responsible for our social media channels and accounts, our editorial direction on The Ford Story , blogger outreach, influencer engagement, program development, team training, global integration and more.

My position is global, so that last piece is crucial.

My team is pretty thin and is comprised of Ford and agency personnel, but we’ve been able to successfully integrate our efforts beyond Communications. While I get a lot of the credit, there are many people behind the scenes who are the real heroes: Connie Fontaine and Jeff Eggen from our Brand & Content Alliances team are responsible for some of our most fun and high-impact programs – particularly the Fiesta Movement and Focus Rally: America.  With their agency team, they create these big talking programs that Ford is known for. Scott Kelly leads us in Digital Marketing and is like the other half of me. Scott and his team execute paid programs in the digital space, including integrations with Leo Laporte’s TWiT network and the Revision3 family of shows, among others.

Then there’s our constant communication with the Customer Service team, who are constantly scouring the web for mentions of Ford and handling issues that come to their attention.

I also serve as Ford’s most prominent online spokesperson. I handle incoming questions and requests via my Ford email account, my personal email account, Twitter @ replies and direct messages and Facebook wall posts as well as requests for interviews via Skype, phone, email, television, radio and more.

I’ve been fortunate to represent Ford as a public speaker at a events, webinars and trade shows. While I don’t get to do it that often, it’s one of the things I enjoy most, because of my ability to bring the Ford story to life and see the impact I’m making on the audience.

What cultural barriers did you face and how did you overcome them?

 

Interestingly enough, I encountered surprisingly few barriers when I came to Ford. We were fortunate to have Alan Mulally join as our CEO in September 2006, and he brought a fresh and different perspective to the company.

After three-and-a-half decades at Boeing, Alan brought his manufacturing leadership and vision for transparency and shared knowledge to Ford.

These are key tenets to social media, so what we’re trying to do with this new form of communication is very much the same culturally. The leadership team’s vision under Alan has been to align us globally so we’re all working together to achieve the same goal, and that we listen first – another social media tenet.

His mantra is, “First, seek to understand. Then seek to be understood.”

That’s not to say it’s a cakewalk.

One of the most difficult things to convey – and I’m still working on it – is just how complex and involved my job is. In the recent Altimeter Group report on the career path of the social strategist (and just quoted in the London Evening Standard), Jeremiah Owyang noted that the role is “deceptively challenging.”

One of our challenges moving forward will be how we integrate social media into more than just Communications, Marketing and Customer Service. While those three areas are the most visible and have the most impact to our reputation, we won’t be truly successful until we’ve unlocked the potential of an outside-in and inside-out mentality of public discourse, feedback and dialog.

 

What was your first big success? How did that change how Ford perceived you? How did it change how the public perceived Ford?

 

There were many firsts, and each has had a different impact.

For example, the Ranger Station incident marked a new way of handling crisis communications and taught us the necessity of being prepared at any moment and more closely aligned with our own Office of General Counsel.

The Fiesta Movement marked the auto industry’s first foray into an extended program that involved real people and demonstrated Ford’s comfort in showing the public what those real people had to say in an unscripted and uncensored way.

The Explorer reveal on Facebook — and in eight cities–showed us the necessity of integrating earned, owned and paid media for maximum effect. Being the first automaker to reveal a car at the Consumer Electronics Show, as we did with the Focus Electric earlier this month, resulted in huge buzz and chatter about Ford at what is usually a tech-dominated show.

With each of these, the public gave Ford credit for trying something new and being an industry leader. We get credit for being cool, hip and “with it,” but we also have used these opportunities, and others, to demonstrate that we have the products to back up what we’re saying. The fact that we were welcomed for the third year in a row as a keynote at CES and that we were heralded for debuted leading technology like MyFord Touch, MyFord Mobile and the Ford Focus Electric, shows that we’re not just an automotive company anymore; we’re a technology company. And when we can get the technology industry and those on the coast to start thinking about us and to consider us for a new vehicle, we’ve succeeded.

How do you think social media has changed Ford’s culture?

I think social media is helping to amplify the cultural change we’ve already seen at Ford and it’s showing employees that we’re serious about transforming the company. They see the programs and success firsthand through our robust and multichannel employee communications platforms, and they see that it’s more than just a series of clever marketing campaigns. Ford’s leadership team ensures that our One Ford message is consistent and constant, and that we’re staying on plan, which in turn ensures our employees that we’re innovating and succeeding. That in turn inspires confidence and morale.

How do you measure Ford’s social media progress?

We constantly benchmark ourselves against other large companies to ensure thinking about every possible angle. We look for the brands that are the most respected in the social media space and aim to be part of that elite group.

Overall, we look at volume and sentiment of coverage of our news and efforts, which includes traditional as well as digital outlets, to ensure consistency of impact across all channels.

When we’re executing finite programs, we perform pre and post benchmarking efforts so we’ll know the specific impact or our efforts. We listen to our customers and fans to determine what they need or would like and try to provide that. The challenge with social media is that – with the exception of the Fiesta Movement – it’s rarely a standalone effort. Our efforts are integrated at every turn, so we’re looking at the collective impact of every one of our media outlets and separating out the digital/social where we can.

 

Is social media used the same way in different countries as it is in the US? Can you compare and contrast just a bit?

When we look at the three major regional divisions of Ford – the Americas; Europe and Asia; Pacific and Africa – we find that there are disparities, but we’re aligning so that we can all benefit from each other’s experience.

There’s no doubt that each region–and country–may have its own preference of platform or device, but if we can ensure that we have a single global strategy, we’ll be in a good place. Think of it as One Ford for social media.

We’re learning about the advanced mobile space from Asia, of the challenge of dealing with a multicultural and multi-language market in Europe, of the needs of a developing nation in India, and of the aggressive growth of social media in Brazil, for example.

The challenge with all of this right now is that programs are now more visible globally than they’ve ever been before. And certain countries that have seen the impact of our work are naturally very anxious to start their own programs. But without the proper underlying strategy and fundamental understanding of some of the communities’ sensitivities, there’s the risk that we may make mistakes that we could otherwise avoid by taking the time to ensure we’re all aligned.

Can you share a little vision for social media’s role at Ford two, five, or 10 years into the future?

That’s a tall order.

Who even knew we’d have this function 10 years ago? In the short term, ensuring we have a globally consistent approach to our efforts is our priority.

Beyond that, we’ll be working to integrate social media into as much of the company as we can, bringing Human Resources, Product Development and other departments into the process so that social media isn’t simply seen as a marketing and communications tool. The long-term vision is that this will be built into the culture of the entire company and that, much like the telephone and email, it will be part of every employee’s workflow.

 

Additional comments.

The last two-and-a-half years have been a whirlwind for me personally.

I could have never predicted that the industry would have taken the drastic turns that it did, nor the degree to which Ford has managed to stand apart from its competition.

Every day, I count myself extremely fortunate that I have the opportunity to serve with some of the best leadership and colleagues in the world in serving Ford Motor Company and that the company has placed its trust in our team. We’re just at the beginning and there’s an exciting and viable Ford that is continuing to make progress!

[Colombia's e-government communications director [at left], shares a chuckle at recent conference]

Back in October, I had the honor of speaking a couple of times in Colombia, to mostly government officials. Logistics made it a hassle. En route I was detained in the airport overnight because of Visa hassles between the US and Brazil. When I finally got to Bogota, my luggage was still detained in Sao Paulo.

It took concerted efforts of my Colombian hosts and a two-hour visit with Colombian customs before I and my suitcases were reunited two days later. I was scheduled to speak the next morning and had not finished my presentation. I was tired, dirty and grumpy when I was informed that some government official wanted wanted to meet with speakers and I could not go back to my hotel for a much needed shower, fresh underwear and alone time.

I went into the meeting wanting only to get out of the meeting as quickly as I possibly could.

But it turned out that the government official in the front of the room was Francisco Camargo Salas, the Director of Colombia’s impressive Government Online Program. As could be predicted, he was armed with a thick PowerPoint presentation. But it turned out to be well worth my time. Francisco was consistently informative and at times inspirational.

But his talk revealed a story of a government that has spent a decade investing in a vision of improved democracy, efficiency, participation through the use of online services. Social media is a growing component of it.

Francisco also revealed he was more interested in listening than talking. Over the next couple of days we chatted in hallways of two events. Both times he focused the conversation on what I thought about what they had done and what I thought the could do to improve.

I went to Colombia thinking that my experiences in talking with government officials in nine countries would help me teach those Colombians a few things. I left understanding how much they can teach me and other governments.

1. The growth of e-government in Colombia since 2003 is phenomenal. What was your government’s vision at the start?

We wanted  to make the relationship between Colombian citizens, businesses and their government agencies easier. For this, we created our Government Online program, which uses ICT [Information and Communications Technologies].

It has helped build a more efficient, transparent and inclusive government.

This has allowed Colombia to become the leader of the Latin America and the Caribbean region and No. 9 in the world in online government services according to the United Nations ranking of e-government.

2. What sort of human and financial resources were invested into e-government? What has been the return on that investment?

From 2001 to 2010, we have invested about USD $ 120 million in the development of Government Online programs. The return on that investment is realized  in more and better procedures and services for Colombians, reduced costs and time, and developing a government intranet that connects people  to public entities where they exchange information.

Government Online is among many developments that have enabled us to  modernize our government agencies.

3. What other factors contributed to the huge growth in participation, such as broadband adoption, use of PC and mobile devices?

It is a fact that the ease-of-access to computers, broadband and mobile telephony have increased participation. That access increases the possibilitythat wherever citizens are located, they will have equal opportunity to contribute and be heard.

The applications, services, social networks and social media are elements that  increase citizen participation. This, coupled with the fact that younger generations have a different consciousness toward participation and collective construction, have not only increased participation, but also allows conditions where citizens can demand a different government, one that is more open and participatory.

4. How does Colombia expect to extend e-government into those parts of the country where connection is currently almost non-existent?

The government, under the leadership of the Ministry of ICT has developed the plan “Vive Digital” -”Digital Living”- for the development of ICT in the country.

The plan’s primary goal is to promote Internet usage by multiplying by four times the number of Internet connections and tripling the number of municipalities connected via optical fiber networks–going from 200 municipalities to 700 of the 1,101 in Colombia–over the next four years.

In addition to the infrastructure access we have strategies to promote the appropriation and training of citizens and the development of online government applications to achieve an expansion and consolidate our strategy.

Similarly the focus of the strategy of Government Online Program 2011 -2019 is to deepen the regional scope, establish monitoring tools and a maturity model that allows a diagnosis of entities and perform various strategies to support them.

5. How do you think e-government has changed government relationships with it’s population?

First, it’s not just Colombian citizens who distrust their governments.

But in Colombia there are still people who are wary of electronic and online transactions. The great challenge we’ve had is ensuring that citizens have confidence and change their relationship with the government, so that they become being more participatory and trust their ideas will be considered.

To this goal, we have committed ourselves to transparency, efficiency and participation; to improving communication channels with citizens to become better aware of their current officials, likewise increasing and improving procedures and services by citizens. This has allowed us to reduce citizen costs and time,  which improves quality of life.

6. Has Colombia learned lessons, that are useful to other governments elsewhere?

Yes.

Colombia has consulted Costa Rica, Uruguay, NIcaragua and Ecuador. In general, we are interested in sharing our critical success factors and received a good experiences all the time. First, and most important, is our responsibility to the all public administration and second is listening to the citizen all the times.

We also learn from other countries.

We constantly monitor trends and best practices of leading countries in e-government. To define 2011 – 2019 strategy, we have the advice of international experts from the U.S. government, Canada, the World Bank, IDB, OAS and other participants who contributed in building strategies.

Additionally, we host and attend events with international consultants to review current trends.

7. What has the the Colombian government done in social media?

The Colombian government is active in social networks and multiple platforms of Web 2.0. While it is true that more and more institutions especially at the regional level should be involved more.

Colombia President Juan Manuel Santos, has a Twitter account, as did his predecessor. The  Ministry of ICT, Ministry of Education, and the Government Online Program, all have Twitter accounts. The Government Online Program also has a presence on social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, post videos on youtube and photos on Flickr. We have blogs and other tools.

We have noteworthy cases such as the Ministry of ICT for Digital Living plan established a virtual space with discussion forums for citizens to contribute ideas to strengthen the strategies.

Our Ministry of Education carried out its annual national educational forum and virtual way to expand its reach through streaming, Skype, social networks, wikis and blogs, among other platforms that enable the participation of citizens from all over the country for the formulation of education policies.

Additionally, the Government Online program has published a manual of introduction to the use of Web 2.0 in the Colombian public agencies that gives guidelines for using social media tools. We hope that citizens have a different and successful approach to the government for virtual media.

8. How do you see government using social media in the future?

Social media has transformed the way we communicate and interact. The government needs to take advantage of the tendency to approach the needs of its citizens and promote opportunities for crowdsourcing to develop solutions to existing problems in our society.

Similarly, it is important to use social media to strengthen e-democracy as mechanisms for collective construction of policies and citizen participation, and open innovation.

9. Can you tell me an interesting story about how online government achieved something that might not otherwise have happened?

In Colombia, we have something called a judicial certificate.  Many businesses and all public bodies  must obtain one to make an employment contract or leave the country. It certifies the existence or absence of criminal records.

Before Government Online, you had to obtain the certificate in person.

People living in remote areas such as the southern department [state] of Putumayo citizens had to travel from their villages by plane to the capital ofdepartment, pay hotel costs, stand in long rows in the open, pay unscrupulous persons who took advantage of the situation and charged for “streamlining” procedures to avoid having to stay an extra day in the city.

The process represented an approximate cost of USD $ 500  and a delay usually of two-to-three days.

In November 2008 we moved this process online. The cost  is now less than USD $ 8. As of this month, the process can be completed for free in 24 hours  without  standing in rows or leaving the comfort of home or work.

Streamlining the process has dramatically increased citizen participation. In 2009, 569,627 certificates were issued, between January and November. In 2010 we issued 1,080,736, an average of 16,000 certificates daily. For the first quarter of 2011, the projection is that we will issue up to 50.000 per day since the process is now free.

This verifies that the internet is the easiest way for citizens to perform this procedure.

10. Additional comments

We are sure the government on line in Colombia is the best form to the transform public administration processes and the role of government with society.

Online is essential to our vision of a government that is for and of the people.

We have an annual  budget of USD $50 million per year over the next four years and new initiatives  that give continuity to Colombia as a leader in the region in e-gov. Most important is that all Colombian people use  e-government all the time, any time.

[KD Paine and unidentified Old Friend at SNCR Conference.]

I had only met  KD Paine once previously when we were slated to debate at a software publishing conference in the middle 1980s. Our topic was whether or not public relations could be measured. At the time, I was a PR operative and she had started a PR measurement firm. I expected it would be a slam-dunk to win the debate, but at best, I fought her to a draw.

I learned then, and I understand now–that KK Paine is a force to be reckoned with when it comes to measurement issues in marketing programs. She is tough and wise, candid and complex. And while the issues of how and what to measure have always been important in business, they have become the key points of debate and contemplation for decision makers considering the strategic and tactical aspects of social media.

I have been writing often about a new term called “social analytics,” and explaining why the term is more complex that most people realize and the need to understand the implications are of great importance.

This is a challenge for most of us. For KD Paine, this is her time.  Let’s pick up my conversation with her.

Just how do you define the term “social analytics?”

It’s whole lot of BS. Let me explain.

It’s not that the term isn’t real, or that applying solid business analytics isn’t important, but in general, most of the people saying, ‘social analytics’ these days  don’t seem to have a clue about measurement or analysis, and probably don’t know much about social media either.

Social analytics is too often used synonymously with social media monitoring or measurement. But, in fact, it is a totally different concept.

So here’s my take on definitions:

Social media monitoring is what companies like SM2 and Radian6 do. They look at vast amounts of data and send you a stream of it that indicates how often your brand or your products are mentioned in that stream.  They essentially count stuff. Most enterprises today are still at the monitoring phase in social media.

Social media measurement is what I do. I develop measurement systems that reflect the specific goals and objectives of a social media program and determine whether or not the efforts are having the desired effect –be it frequency of mention, development of brand awareness, increase in engagement or generating traffic.  Sodexo, SAS, Dell, Southwest Airlines, Cisco, Adobe, Vico Software are all measuring their social media effort and this is a phase beyond just monitoring.

Social analytics is where measurement and business intelligence converge.

Essentially, social analytics is a combination of two important concepts – ‘social’ – i.e. things having to do with our society, our interactions and our relationships – the warm fuzzy stuff; and ‘analytics’ – which refers to the analysis of data and statistics. This stuff is neither warm, nor fuzzy but is very important to your business.

Social analytics looks at the myriad data points generated by social media measurement and runs a variety of statistical regressions [Measuring how changing one variable results in changes to other variables]. They determine what impact, if any, all that activity, awareness and engagement is having on the bottom line.  Comcast, Dell, Southwest and IBM are among the few companies that are actually this far along.

In the interest of transparency,  I should note that my business partner SAS Software calls itself  “the leader in business analytics software” and they have a product called Social Media Analytics.

To them, analytics means taking huge volumes of data and running all kinds of statistical analysis on it to draw conclusions about what makes a comp profitable or unprofitable, what works or doesn’t work. Among the data they look at is what is being said about a person or company in social media.

You’ve been measuring PR and marketing since about the time the wheel first launched. What’s changed so much? What’s so different about today’s social analytics, from yesterday’s PR campaign?

Lots.

PR campaign success was measured in terms of “hits.” We used to say that stands for “How Idiots Track Success.”  The more hits, the better, some thought. About two decades ago, a few more sophisticated companies started measuring what I call “Opportunities to See,”  or OTS, impressions – based on the audited circulation figures for the publications.

Somehow, PR people assumed that the more impressions, the more awareness, even though there was no evidence to support that.

Social Media has changed all that.

  • First, impressions no longer count. What’s the “circulation” of Global Neighbourhoods, for example? If I look your blog up on Compete it tells me you get 207 unique visitors per month.  Hardly reflective of the influence you wield.  And do 40 million people really see every story on Yahoo News?

What matters now is what people do after they read your post. Do they click thru, register, ask for more information? It’s no longer how many people you reach, it’s what they do AFTER you’ve reach them.

  • Measuring influence is a whole new ballgame. In old time PR measurement you had a list of influencers that you had to pay attention to and that list got updated maybe once a year. Now that list needs to be updated every month.
  • PR could only promise engagement, in social media you can actually measure it.  In the olden days, we could only hope that people would be engaged enough with what we were feeding reporters that they might act, or get more engaged with the brand. Now we can measure a whole spectrum of engagement.
  • PR’s job was to control the message—essentially a one-way process. Now, control is no longer part of the vocabulary. Nowadays, it’s PR’s job to build relationships and conduct two-way conversations. Jim Grunig [l.] defined “excellent PR” as a two-way synchronous conversation – TWO DECADES AGO. PR is just now being forced to come around to accept that philosophy. So now you need to measure the message in a way that was not so important a decade ago.

You and I have disagreed on more than a few occasions—sometimes quite publicly.  But we do agree on one issue: computers lack common sense. Got a good story for our studio audience that illustrates how obviously computers sometimes miss the obvious?

My favorite is recent.  My team was measuring press coverage for our client,  the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, generally referred to as  the Cleveland Fed.

Suddenly, last July our computer-driven news feed showed a remarkably high level of coverage tagged as negative. This puzzled us, since people usually didn’t have strong emotions attached to the Cleveland Fed.

But when actual humans dug into the data, we quickly discovered that the press was filled with reports saying that Cleveland basketball fans were fed up with a certain basketball star who has since moved on to Miami.

Computers saw the words “Cleveland” and “Fed” in close proximity. They observed a negative feeling and based on solid data gave absolutely false results.

Another of my favorites was looking up the phrase cloud for a  manufacturer interested in “storage virtualization.” Most of the conversation the computers found turned out to be reports on people spending their weekend clearing out personalstorage bins.

All you have to do is to run your own name through any typical “sentiment analysis” engine and you’ll find dozens of examples. Here are the latest negatives for you, Shel:

And for me:

Just how important is social analytics to mainstream adoption of social media?

Huge.

Unless we can tie social media to the actual business results, the fearful, the skeptical and dinosaurs will continue to claim that because it can’t be measured it should not be adopted.

Longterm, the dinosaurs will die, and those companies that do use social analytics to statistically prove the connection to the bottom line will be the ones that will soar in this environment.

I recently had an interesting interchange with the folks at Klout. On one hand, a lot of people argued that Klout results make no sense. On the other, these guys have 17 technologists working fulltime, checking 35 data points to get the results they get. My question: What do you think of Klout’s efforts to measure influence? How could it be done better?

First of all, influence exists only in the minds of the customers or the target audience. Klout can’t possibly know what is influential to me or to you, they can only hope to program computers to guess correctly.  You’ve done enough PR to know that in almost every industry there are those “gurus of your marketplace’ who influence the influencers who influence the media who influence the buying public.

How did you create that list? You read their stuff, you saw who responded, and you saw where they were quoted. Can computers be taught to do that? Yes, are they there yet? NO! Which is why I like Traackr’s system so much – -they actually use humans to check the data, read the writings of those influencers, measure the comments etc.

Do you see a time when there will be universal definition and measurement standards for soft social media terms like “engagement,” “Influence” “sentiment,” etc.

Ketchum, Maggie Fox, Weber, You, Me, Zoetica etc. having a Kumbaya moment and THEN having enough money to actually persuade everyone that we’re right?  I think mid-East peace is more likely.

Companies like Dell are catching about 15,000 mentions a day. If the KDPaine secret sauce is to insert a human element into social analytics. how can it possibly scale?

First, how many of those 15,000 are relevant – - how many are talking about the Farmer in the Dell, or my father Del Paine. How many talk about a Dell employee dying or getting married? How many are appearing on fake blogs that no one will ever see?  My guess is that they probably get closer to 5000 a day in valid mentions. Then it is just a question of HOW you insert that human element.

You can either randomly sample the computer output to make sure it is correct  — which is how my group does it.  Or, you get trained humans to read 5000 or so to a level of 90% accuracy. Then you use that coded data to teach the computer how to do it right. Then you test the computer against the human coding until the computer is 90% accurate. THAT’s how you make it both accurate and scalable (and that’s what we’re doing with SAS).

All this being said, I am repeatedly told that most c-level decision-makers still want an ROI measurement for social media. Can social analytics provide it? Should it?

Yes, absolutely, but the problem is that most c-level decision makers can’t define the “R” in the ROI that they expect, nor are they willing to do what is necessary to measure it.  To measure ROI you need to have seamless data sharing and integration between the business intelligence people, the social media people, customer satisfaction folks, and the marketing team. How often does that happen?

Not nearly often enough.  Also, they need to understand that the “R” doesn’t always mean sales, or market share, it means bottom line benefit. So the ROI is in fact more likely to be measured in terms of money saved, or greater efficiency or a shortened sales cycle.

Please give me your vision for the state of social analytics, 3-5 years down the pike? What will that do for/to social media in the enterprise?

Great question, short answer: who the fuck knows?

Within the enterprise today, there is way more technology than people know what to do with. They aren’t using half the stuff they have.

They are doing really simplistic things with counting likes and mentions, but they aren’t drawing any meaningful conclusions.

My vision is that with better use of analytics AND statistical analysis and more of a marketing mix modeling approach they will be able to do a better job teasing out cause and effect between social media and consumer behavior. Of course, in order to do this we will need to move beyond this stupid level of “sentiment” analysis and train computers to measure trust and commitment and other elements of relationships. But given the pace already and the competitive environment, I’m guessing they’ll crack that code by 2015.

Additional comments?

I think what is really interesting to day is the impact that Groupon and Foursquare will have on measurement – because they are so highly measurable, marketers who are screaming for ROI may well pull money out of Twitter and Facebook and put it into them just because they are so much more measureable.

This is the second and final part of my interview with Jack Holt, the chief social media strategis for the US Department of Defense. [You can see Part 1 here.]

Jack has two qualities I greatly admire. First, of course, he is passionate and making a difference by using social media and second, he is a great story teller, as I hope this interview shows.

When I asked him for some candid photos of himself, he sent a few including this one from his beardless days. He is kneeling at the grave of his great grandfather who was a direct descendent of John Marshall, the first Supreme Court Justice. He also can track his lineage to the plantation of Robert E. Lee, as well as a Cherokee grandmother. His father and grandfather were actors.

Why does all this matter? I think where Jack has been and who he comes from his given him a sense that we are making history as we live. That history looks different from the perspectives of different people. I think that Jack has a sense of that balance and I also believe he found social media because he understands that we can judge what has happened much better through conversational accounts, than monologues.

But let’s get back to the Pentagon’s impressive social media program, which is the subject at hand.

Can you compare and contrast conversations with bloggers to conversations with traditional media reporters?

Bloggers tend not to be so interested in “breaking news” as much as they are in “breaking understanding.”

Bloggers are more like debaters than reporters. Traditional media reporters are looking for facts. Facts presented in a way to tell a compelling story. They focus on specifics and connections to things past and present in an effort to bring forth truth. In a way, it is a dynamic effort for a static response. It is incident-focused and specific-looking for the truth of what happened.

Bloggers, on the other hand, typically follow the basic rules of debate: “What is the authority of your source? …the strength of your argument, and the power of your ideas?”

Bloggers are typically looking for the understanding of what is happening. They tend to focus more on why something is happening and what it means for the future.

How do you think conversational media activities have changed DoD’s public position? What about its relationship with traditional media?

I think there is greater understanding about the activities and operations of the Department of Defense. I think it has also enhanced our relationship with the traditional media.

Many of DoD’s stories, really don’t rise to the level of “news” at first. What is interesting is the use of our conversational media stories by the traditional press to enhance and expand the public debate and understanding.

So, does that confuse the concept of traditional media as gatekeeper for what the public should know?

The job of “gatekeeper” is no longer needed. It is an artificial construct developed over the past 100 or so years filling gaps in communication technology. The job of “watchdog” is now and has never been more important.

My grandfather taught me a Cherokee proverb: If you listen to whispers, you will not hear screams. We need the traditional media to be listening to the whispers.

In addition to the Bloggers Roundtable [covered in Part 1], DOD has started an interesting podcast series called, “Armed with Science.” A recent episode discussed the effects of sonar on marine mammals.” Can you tell me the strategic thinking behind the series? What has been the result?

Armed with Science is an interesting story.

We were exploring ways to expand the scope of what we were doing with DoDLive. The Blogger Roundtables were good, but we felt we could do more.

Dr. John Ohab had been working with us for a while, studying our efforts “New Media” when he became interested in the efforts of our DoD science labs. We do a lot of interesting sciency stuff in those labs.

Dr. John brought up the idea of Armed with Science at about the same time we were organizing a Bloggers Roundtable session with the scientists at the Naval Observatory who maintain the atomic clock.

Dr. Ohab was part of the team that did the interview and so our first Armed with Science blog and podcast was about the atomic clock. Wired magazine’s Noah Schactman, who covers security for Wired’s Danger Room saw the blog and wrote a short article saying he wondered why anyone would be interested in the atomic clock, then found the interview quite interesting. With his endorsement it soon gained traction and has now become a staple.

As I ask you these questions, the Wikileaks controversy dominates news coverage everywhere.  Does this sort of thing increase pressure on you to shut down your very transparent efforts–particularly soldiers in the field using social media to talk with loved ones?

There is concern in this area but not so much pressure. I’m putting pressure where I can to understand that things like Wikileaks are not a social media problem, it is a personnel training problem.

The only social media aspect to Wikileaks is that Wiki is in the name. This was an individual being irresponsible with the information he was charged with keeping. In times past this would have been considered negligence at best and treason at worst. What needs to be escalated is our training efforts.

I asked folks on Twitter to send me questions for you. I got one from Shel Holtz who conducted a great FIR podcast with you a back. He’s like to know what DOD does to prevent viruses, bots and other malicious infection from working into Defense networks? How big is the risk? How expensive the prevention?

We have various and sundry anti-virus software, proxies, firewalls and data-at-rest and data-in-motion technical protections. But the best network protection is a properly trained and educated workforce.

I heard one CIO say “I can defend my network, but I cannot protect it.” Security is a shared responsibility. That shared responsibility can be enhanced by the proper design of transparent communication networks.

Social media tools allow for transparency. They demand it. Social media tools inside the firewall will allow for transparent communication inside an organization which will enhance the agility of the workforce and the ability to train the workforce to spot and respond to attacks. We can watch out for each other.

How does social media change the structure of DoD?

In a hierarchical organization, the center of gravity is the headquarters. It is very rigid and inflexible and the strength of that protection is in the rigidity.

In a networked organization, the center of gravity is at the edge. The edge of the organization is the point of contact and the all efforts should be to empower and enable the people at the edge.

I call this “Casting the Net.”

Have you ever seen someone throw a fishing net? That net is weighted at the edges so that it will spread flat when properly thrown. There is technique and skill required to effectively cast a net, but the net must also be configured correctly.

If it is not, or you don’t know how to cast it, you end up with it knotted up laying in the floor of the boat. Properly networked operations will allow those involved to draw upon the wisdom of the organization to effectively self-synchronize around the effort at hand.

That can only happen with transparent communication. Transparent communication internally to an organization will result in better situational awareness of the members, a more agile operation, and more robust external communication when an organization has proper leadership.

11. Additional comments?

Yes, I need to add that these are my opinions and not necessarily reflective of the views of the Department of Defense. Some things never change.

Jack Holt at recent SNCR NewComm Forum. Photo by KD Paine.

[This is a restart of my social media global report, an ongoing series of interviews with people from all over the world on how they use social media in work and life. There have been over 350 such Q&A reports since 2005. Many of them became the starting points for content that I've used in books, articles and speeches. If you can suggest someone for a future SM Global Report, please email me: shelisrael1@gmail.com.--SI]

He’s an actor’s son, educated in PR and working as a communications officer for the US. Department of Defense. With those credentials I did not expect Charles “Jack” Holt to be among the most approachable, transparent and credible people I’ve met through social media, but he is.

His official title is Senior Strategist for New/Emerging Media, Department of Defense. That’s government talk for Jack being the Pentagon’s top social media guy.

Holt has been a key part of a Defense department team that has used social media in innovative and powerful ways. It began because the Pentagon felt it could not tell its story properly in traditional media, not because of unfair coverage, but because the press is more concerned with fast-breaking than deep-and-continuing news.

There was some frustration involved. There was a top-down directive–and there was some collaborative and creative thinking involved. This, the first of two parts, focuses on a Blogger’s Roundtable that changed perceptions of the Pentagon, the qualities of blogger outreach programs for organizations that feel they cannot get their stories properly told through traditional programs.

Jack is a good story teller, and the stories he tells have lessons for other enterprises facing similar problems with traditional media.

One additional note: This interview follows on excellent  podcast interviews by two colleagues: Shel Holtz and Eric Schwarzman. I have tried to build and expand upon their earlier reports.

Q. When we first met, you told me about the role you played in the 1995 Oklahoma City terror incident.  Can you retell it now?

I’ll do my best.

In April of 1995 I was a student at the University of Central Oklahoma and working for an operations company at Will Rogers World Airport in Oklahoma City. I worked the night shift on April 18th and on the morning of April 19th I had was awakened by a rumbling that shook my house at 9:02 am.

I turned on the TV and saw a traffic helicopter video feed of a large black cloud rising from the center of Oklahoma City. About 15 minutes later the voice of John Hanson, the Oklahoma City fire chief came across the TV set as he explained there had been a massive explosion  downtown.

Five minutes later, my boss called me, asking me to come get out to the airport  where they were already  making arrangements for a massive rescue and recovery effort that would include supplies and support to fly in soon.

Part of my job was to monitor the news so we would know what to expect.

There are several lessons I learned from the incident.

Lesson 1. Fire Chief John Hanson,  a well-known and popular figure around town, remained very active. Most every time there was a fire incident of note, Chief Hanson was on the scene, working with reporters to cover the story while directing the efforts and allowing his crews to do their job.

Part of leadership is creating the conditions for your people to do their jobs effectively. His dealing with the press cultivated that. And one not to miss an opportunity to teach a lesson, usually his interviews with the press included telling people how they can avoid being in the situation on which they were reporting. By being visible and approachable and through his conversations with the public through the media, John Hanson had developed credibility with the community.

On April 19, Chief Hanson was quickly on the air exercising leadership and guiding, not only the fire department response, but  the public response. He picked a vantage point which gave the media visible access to the incident and also remain close to his command post so that he didn’t waste time moving to and from the incident.

Lesson 2. He accommodated the media so the media could accommodate his ability to lead.

The chief was available as much as he possibly could be and when one of his spokespeople filled in, his leadership was reinforced by the messages: 1). Here’s what we know, 2). Here’s what we’re doing, 3). Here’s what we need you to do.

Lesson 3. Engage the community. Those three messages were updated throughout the incident. They informed the community of what was happening and, more important, engaged them in the response.

Some requests were small, “Please turn off your cell phone we need the bandwidth for communication” (The police, fire, and emergency response radio antennas were all on top of the Murrah Building which was destroyed so emergency communication in the downtown area was relegated to cell phones), or “please do not come downtown unless you are a medical or emergency worker.” As I mentioned, he not only led the rescue effort, he led the community in the rescue effort. Everyone was involved.

Q. You also told me about some interesting behavior by one of the national broadcast film crews. Can you share that again?

Sure.

As the magnitude of the incident became more apparent, national media interest grew. Through various channels we learned to expect the influx of national reporters and crews through our airport. We helped arrange transportation, maps, etc. to expedite getting the crews to the site.

One crew, who shall remain nameless–except to say the network has the letter A–in its name, arrived on our ramp, offloaded enough gear for four- or five crews, and asked if we could store what they didn’t need.

We did. And then the crew began to outfit themselves with riot gear– flack jackets, helmets and such, and then rain gear as the weather had turned cold and wet, and then they ran out the door, jumped into their rented minivan and off they went.

Several hours later, they returned to retrieve their gear and I struck up a conversation with one of the cameramen asking him how it went.

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” he said. “We got downtown and I saw the crowds of people.  I’ve covered Desert Storm and spent time in Rwanda and I’ve never seen anything like it.”

This was not a rookie cameraman and I figured he’d seen some really bad stuff so I was a bit perplexed and asked, “The building?”

“No,” he said. “The people. I expected them to be angry, ready to riot. I was down on the ground shooting video when this person walks up to me, which made me very nervous, and asked ‘would you like a sandwich? Coffee? You must be cold.’ and I was stunned. Nobody ever treated me like that at an incident like this. And it wasn’t just that person. Everyone was there to help somehow and any way they could. I’ve never seen anything like it.”

The incident produced Lesson 4.  Leadership is communication and communication is leadership.
Q. On the day that Anna Nicole Smith was the headline story in virtually all American papers, I was in Miami at a media executive conference hearing how the American people filtersand gatekeepers to select news for them. Where were you on that day? What other news was available and competing for the headlines grabbed by the death of divorced, controversial model?

Ah, yes. I remember that day.

It was the first week of February 2007. General [David] Petraeus had arrived in Baghdad as commander of the Multinational Force Iraq [MFNI] in January and began the “Change of Strategy” that many had been clamoring for.

The first effort in this change occurred a week or so before and was dubbed “The Battle of Haifa Street.” This established the first combat outpost to be positioned within the population. The battle lasted for three days and there was some very compelling video and photos captured in the battle. It told the story of soldiers in battle and MNFI took that video and released it to the media. It made the evening news cycle in the U.S. and then the next morning’s news cycle. Then, it was dropped, as all the news coverage shifted to Anna Nicole’s death.

Q. How did that incident evolve into the DOD Blogger Roundtable?

That’s the interesting part.

In October 2006 the Quadrennial Defense Review was released and in the Strategic Communication Roadmap was a priority to “learn to communicate in a 24/7 New Media environment.”

I was part of that team  and had been working since October with the Public Affairs and Strategic Effects people at MNFI to explore how we could help them. I was surveying the “milblogosphere” [military bloggers] to find out what they wanted from us.

The milbloggers were explicit. That were succinct and clear: “Give us access and make it linkable.” Ok, so how do we do that? Some wanted to embed reporters with units downrange, but the rules wouldn’t let them because they had no publisher other than themselves. They would need insurance. They would need support. How would they get it? Those were the things I was assigned to work on with MNFI.

When Anna Nicole’s death knocked the Battle of Haifa Street out of the news, then-Major General Bill Caldwell, the MFNI deputy chief of staff for strategic effects, asked his communication folks, “What happened?” “Where did the coverage go?”

“That’s the way the news business is, boss,” they answered.

“Well, do something different,” he responsed.

And they did. They called me and asked, “We want to start a YouTube Channel, but that will take some time. What can we do tomorrow?”

My response was to have them send me all the images and video they released to the press, I would send it out to the bloggers and I asked them if they could get someone to talk to the bloggers via a telephone conference call.

They agreed and we set it up a conference called between about a dozen bloggers and Rear Adm. [Mark I.] Fox, Maj. Gen. Caldwell’s deputy. The call was scheduled for 30 minutes and ran 45.

The questions were insightful, probing, deep and they allowed Rear Adm. Fox to elaborate and explain what the Battle of Haifa Street was all about. It was a very rich discussion. Rear Adm. Fox told Maj. Gen. Caldwell, “You have to talk to these guys. That was a great experience.” About a week later Gen. Caldwell was a guest on the call and the DoDLive Bloggers Roundtable was born. We expected to do one or two a month. At its height, we were  averaging of two-to-three daily.

Q. Can you tell me one interesting Bloggers Roundtable anecdote that demonstrates how successful it has been for DOD?

We did one with Maj. Gen. Douglas Stone, USMC who, at the time was the Commander of Task Force 134, Detainee Operations in Iraq. During his tenure, Maj. General Stone  made some major changes in detainee operations. He started optional general education and Islamic religious classes for detainees along with offering trade skills like carpentry and bricklaying. They were conducted by Iraqi teachers and clergy.

Most detainees were vetted and then either released or turned over to the Iraqi civil courts if found to be actual bad guys. The changes were so well accepted and attended by the detainees, that when they got out, they quit calling it “release” and started calling it “graduation.” At one graduation a woman came up to Maj. Gen. Stone and asked, “Can you keep my son one more year?”

Maj. Gen. Stone said, “Ma’am, you don’t understand. He’s no longer a detainee, he’s free to go home.”

The woman said, “No General. You don’t understand, we live in a small village. There is no work for him there. You are teaching him. You are training him. He is safe here. Just one more year and things will be better in our village and he can come home and find work.”

Washington Post researchers caught the anecdote and forwarded it to Walter Pincus, their Pulitzer Prize winning national security reporter. Pincus  wrote a front-page top-of-the-fold story. It was followed by two more stories in the Weekend Edition in a four-page pull-out special section on the developments in Iraq. Three stories from that one Bloggers Roundtable session.

[Next: Jack Holt discusses the overall impact social media programs have on traditional media and discusses another innovative program that changes how people may see the US Pentagon.

I have an assortment of activities I do related to social media–writing, consulting, speaking and seemingly endless tweeting. The spine of all these activities has been my Social Media Global Report.

Started in 2006, I have interviewed a diversity of people about how social media has changed their lives and work. There have been over 120 of these interviews posted on this blog under the “SM Global Report” category. They have included Michael Dell, founder of Dell Computer; Bob Lutz, erstwhile vice chairman of General Motors; Isaac Mao, China’s first bloggerWael Abbas, who exposes police wrongdoing in Egypt; Father Roderick, a podcasting priest and Janis Krums, the sports supplement enthusiast who twit-pixed the famous photo of a plane landing on the Hudson.

Sometimes the people I interview for the Global Report wind up in the books or magazine articles I’ve written. Others are the subject of stories I tell in my speaking engagements–or in case studies for for my consulting gigs.

While others look at measurement, data and practices, I look at the people who have been pioneers in social media. I believe that if you hear their stories, you may get some ideas about how social media can help you and your work.

In any case, it’s been a period of great diversion for me and I have gone quite some time without writing these SM Global Reports. It is time to start writing them again.

I am starting to gather stories of people in business, government, media, education, law enforcement, civil disobedience, causes and other areas of focus for a new series of SM Global Reports that will begin after the holidays, if not sooner.

I get pitched a lot by PR people. I rarely write about start ups or new technologies, which are covered by a great number of social media writers. I’m the guy to pitch after the newness has worn off, and there are anecdotes and lessons to be shared from success or failure. I am interested in how social media changes lives and business.

This is a great time to pitch me with new ideas. It is probably best if you read a few of these interviews on my blog first so you get a sense of what I am after and how the columns are written.

You can leave a comment here, email or tweet me.

[Note. I am just catching up on posting travel notes from my recent speaking tour. This is my last post on Cape Town. It has nothing to do with Social Media. It has much to do with social segregation under the ugliness that was Apartheid.]

I loved the scifi thriller, District 9. But, when I watched this work of fiction about man’s inhumanity to giant prawns from outer space, I had just an inkling that it was an expansion of a six-minute film short created as an allegory to the forced relocation of the people of Soweto, a thriving black community in Johannesburg during the ugliness that was Apartheid. The reasons given for the mass evictions was simply that whites wanted the property.

I also had absolutely no clue that a very similar incident took place over the last 20 years of Apartheid, in Cape Town, perhaps for even less reason than at Soweto.

It was called District 6, a neighborhood of about  60,000 people. The largest ethnic group, according to Apartheid classifications were the “coloreds,” people of mixed racial blood. There were also Africans, Muslims, Jews and Hindus.

An hour’s visit to the Cape Town District 6 Museum, gives you sense of a community that was not unlike Harlem in the 40s rich in diversity and culture, filled with artisans, musicians, neighborhood shops, restaurants and night life. There were schools, taverns, pool halls and churches as well as mosques and synagogues.

In the 1960s, with little advanced warning, the ruling Nationalist Party declared District 6 “for whites only,” and the process of often forcefully relocating 60,000 people began, the houses, shops, police stations bulldozed. Everything was leveled, except the  churches, which still stand today, surrounded by vacant lots–ironic shrines to people who once lived there and had faith.

Cape Town, overall is a beautiful city, among the most appealing I have seen. Except there is evidence of poverty almost everywhere you look, and tin-roofed shanty towns overflow with people who who have never had employment or lived in a home that has indoor plumbing. It needs housing urgently and can create jobs to construct such homes.

Today, 35 years after this diaspora began, most of District 6 is one huge vacant lot.

I was in Cape Town to speak at the WTF Media Conference, produced by the  Cape Peninsula University of Technology, which fills one of the few large building complexes in District 6. The student body is highly integrated. They represent the first generation born after Apartheid fell. I spent time with a few of the students.

Among my favorites was Traviss Michaels, a senior who aspires to work in international relations when he graduates. He was often my designated driver, shuttling me on short junkets from hotel to the university.

Traviss was one of three students who joined me in a visit to the District 6 Museum. We entered the museum and queued up to buy tickets from a disinterested older black man, who scrutinized the students.

“You’re Traviss Michaels, aren’t you?”

“Yes.”

“Your father was the District 6, bus driver.”

“Yes, he was.” They both smiled at each other, then looked downward silently, perhaps remembering Traviss’ dad.

“He was my friend,” the older man said.

Traviss nodded and we walked in.

The museum is relatively small. It is filled with old clothing, furniture and photos. You’ve probably seen similar stuff in stores that sell used goods. But the rooms are filled with ghosts. The building tells you people lived nearby. They thrived and suffered, danced and prayed.

Traviss found photos of some of his relatives on a wall behind and old Victrola.

The atrium is decorated with embroidered streamers representing the ethnic groups who had lived in District 6. There is a string of street signs from streets that no longer exist.

I’m told that the Johannesburg Apartheid Museum, is an absolute don’t miss place if you want to understand the big picture of Apartheid. The District 6 Museum is a more modest effort. It shows you how one, relatively small area was demolished and its people disbursed.

Soweto had been a center of resistance to white supremacy and it is remembered that way. District 6, was not a great center of resistance. It’s apparent crime was that people of diverse racial and religious backgrounds got along pretty well with each other.

I was moved by the experience.

My inveterate friend Tom Foremski picked City Lights Bookstore at 6 pm for getting together. It seemed fitting. Tom and I are both writers whose styles and perspectives were shaped in the 60s and City Lights, is the last bastion of the stormy renaissance that is usually called “The Beat Era.”

I finished my business in San Francisco earlier than expected. I arrived at City lights at 4:30 with abundant time to kill.  I strolled the shelves of poet-bookseller Lawrence Ferlinghetti’s fabled bookstore. I had read a great many of the books being offered and I had read them long ago.

But I’m not big on nostalgia and after a short while I felt like I had been there and done that as far as City Lights was concerned. I had killed less than half an hour.

I wandered outside and watched the amazing diversity of the neighborhood, clicking a few street scene photos. The neighborhood is like a Coney Island of the mind.  City Lights is sort of a cultural island surrounded by diverse sections of San Francisco. You are just a few footsteps from the Financial District, Chinatown and the restaurants of North Beach.

It also abuts the strip joints and porn shops of San Francisco’s small, seamy adult entertainment district. There, just a couple of doors down from a sex toy supermarket I caught a new marquee: The Beat Museum, and I wandered over.

It cost four bucks to get in and what a weird, strange trip it will deliver. If you were on the magic bus of the 60s, its a visit to memory lane. If you were were not, then it educates you that the Beat Generation was a period of enlightenment, a time to explore the hope of peace and tolerance. Yes it was about sex and drugs, but it was so much more than that.

It was a period of art and music, of poetry and challenging conventional truths. It was a period of people bypassing powerful institutions, conventional wisdom and tolerance. It was a time where people exchanged ideas, often with great passion attached to them.

Very quickly, The Beat Museum brings all that back. It looks at the usual nexus of the era: Allen Ginsberg, Neal Cassidy and the others, but mostly it spotlights Jack Kerouac, but mostly it talks about Jack Kerouac, author of several groundbreaking books, the best-remembered being On the Road.

Kerouac, was my favorite. His style was fast and contemporary. It sounded at times like the bebop jazz that he loved. You felt like you got to know the people he wrote about because his conversations were so, well, naked.

There are so many ties between the roots of social media and the beat era. Many of the thinkers and technologists who have provided us with the tools were shaped in that era.

It seems to me that we of the social media movement are braided and bonded to those of the Beat Generation. We have a love of innovation. We have hope for a future that provides people greater health and safety. We believe that conversation will reveal much and resolve a few differences. We have a distrust of the all-powerful and the institutional. We reserve the right to question anything.

Kerouac used a manual typewriter and wrote books. If he were alive today, I’m sure he’s still write books, but he would use the tools of our time. He would be unquestionably among the most prominent of our bloggers.

The style he pioneered is the style that succeeds the best in the blogosphere, whether you are talking for an enterprise or telling about a traveling adventure.

Yes, Kerouac would have tweeted as well. He probably would also have been prolific with a handheld camera. Kerouac understood, even in writing books, that it’s dialog that matters. He captured conversations in his books.

Just think of what he could do with the tools we have today. Just think of the influence he would have on the young minds of today as he had on the young minds of the 60s.

In 1953, Ralph Ellison wrote The Invisible Man a book I was required to read in college in the 1960s and one that has shaped my thinking. The invisible man in that book was a black man, one that you would pass by without seeing; you could say what you wanted within earshot of him and it did not matter, because well, it was as if he wasn’t there.

Over the years, I have become aware of all sorts of invisible people in the world, those whom we are more comfortable ignoring than acknowledging; those whose problems do not concern us, because their poverty or affliction was not our doing.

Mark Horvath has been a commercial TV producer and a recording artist. He’s also a great writer and story teller. Earlier in his diverse career, he was teen age pot dealer and would end up being one of those invisible people along Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles. If I had passed him by in 1995, I probably would not have seen him at all–except for the large lizard on his shoulder.

Mark is now producing TV again at invisiblepeople.TV. He is also tweeting at Hardly Normal. To say his new endeavor is being done on a shoestring might exaggerate his assets. But the next time you want a dose of reality TV, try watching some f Mark’s incredibly interesting, moving and occasionally inspirational episodes.

His story is below, but first one other note: Mark could really use some editing equipment. If you have some to spare contact him through me or at Hardly Normal.

1. Let’s start with your background. Where were you born and raised? What did you aspire to do when you grew up?

I grew up In Binghamton, NY.  At age 14 until I was 16 I sold an average of 20 pounds of marijuana per week.  It was my first business experience. As a kid, I could not come home with a new car so the group of kids that helped me –my “employees” would spend event cent on anything fun.


I also started to play drums professionally–meaning I made money–at age 14. By the time I was 16 music gave me the same power that selling drugs did, and since people now gave me drugs to hang with the ‘band,’ and since I was no longer a minor and laws changed if I was caught selling drugs –  I stopped selling.


At 17, I formed a record and publishing company and produced my first single. Music became my life. I also learned how to do lots with a little. I did not have money to compete with major labels, but by using a little extra effort and creative thinking the stuff I produced came across with big budget excellence.


At age 26, my girlfriend and I moved to LA. I did a little everything for a while: music, acting, working apprentice special effects on B movies.

In 1990, I was playing music fulltime and got a girl pregnant. I thought I would need health insurance and started to look for ‘normal’ work. I lied on an application to a major TV syndicator. They hired me as traffic supervisor. Two weeks later they fired my boss and made me traffic manager.  Soon, I ran traffic, mass duplication, vault and fulfillment services for a major TV company. It may not have been glamorous, but if you watched TV from 1990 to 1994 I was responsible for getting it to your TV set.


2. How did you become homeless?


My homelessness resulted from a series of bad decisions and severe drug abuse over a 20-year period. I was always a very high-functioning drug addict. I didn’t lose my job because I was on drugs; I lost it because I refused to obey an order to fire a Mexican to cover a mistake made by a a senior executive.


They fired one of my team members anyway. I screamed about it and the madness sent my drug abuse into overdrive and that cost me my job. I went back to old habits and started hanging out with some very bad people.

I lost it mentally, emotionally and spiritually.


I lived on or near Hollywood Boulevard off and on for about a year. I would go into a homeless shelter and kicked out.  I was brought down to the point of no support, and no security.

It’s very hard to explain what homelessness is like. Living on the streets is hopeless and horrible.  You beat yourself up with, “how did I get here” and “how am I going to get out of here” questions.


Visiting my homeless memories are not easy for me. I remember, in 1995, sitting by what was then a tee-shirt shop next to Grumman’s Chinese Theatre. My pet Mark Horvath & DOG
6-foot-long iguana, “D.O.G.” was sitting on my shoulder. My head was buried in my hands. I was lost in thoughts of my situation.


Then, a busload of Asian tourists unloaded and a group of them surrounded me. One  asked, “can I take a picture of your Iguana?”

“Sure”, I said “for a dollar.” Everyone started handing me dollar bills. It was at that moment that I started to sell photos of D.O.G. and became “The Lizard Man Of Hollywood Boulevard.”


There’s irony. Grumman’s Chinese Theater became Kodak Theater. Fifteen years ago I survived by panhandling in front of it. In 2009, thanks to Jeff Pulver, I presented from the stage at The 140 Characters Conference because of my Twitter experience.


That’s AMAZING!


3. Tell me your happiest personal story from you homeless days. Tell me your saddest.

There are no happy stories.


There are memories that I now laugh at, but I don’t consider them happy. Here is a post I wrote for Change.org about my first homeless night. After walking all day to find a safe place to sleep, I finally lay down in a park only for the sprinklers to go off.


Horrible then – funny now!



4. When, how and why did you decide to not be homeless?


No one decides to be homeless.


I mean, people do dumb things that often have negative consequences. But ‘Recycling Engineer’ is never an option on career day.


I can tell you right now looking at it from both sides the system is broken. I completely understand why some people give up trying. You keep hitting wall after wall trying to make your life better and eventually it wears you down.

It’s called learned helplessness.


After everything I have been through I cannot honestly tell you why or how I made it. But I did.


What I can tell you is that I didn’t do it alone. Along that way when I was at my lowest someone was there to give a hand. We must never give up on people. Ever. I was one of the worst of the worst, yet I changed.


I’m proof that anyone can change and have a better life.


5. Having been through such an experience, you elected to then spend your life working with and for the homeless. Why?


Oh please know I didn’t pick this life. Several people have blogged about me being a hero and I cringe – I’m really not that nice – I’m not.


I just could no longer walk by people and do nothing. And that didn’t just happen overnight, either. In a way, I had heart surgery and I’ll never be the same.


I November 2007, I was working in St. Louis and earning in the six figures when I lost my job. I aggressively searched for nine months, paying my mortgage and food with my credit cards.


Executive jobs were still being cut and low end employers like McDonalds wouldn’t hire me after seeing my last income.


I crashed hard. I remember applying for food stamps. Walking into the building crushed me like it did when I was homeless applying for government assistance.


I was about done when I lucked into a job back in Los Angeles. I grabbed a ghetto apartment to save money since because I had all the St. Louis debt to deal with. Three months later I was one of 50 people to get laid off. It devastated me.

I felt like I had when I had been homeless 15 years earlier, maybe worse since I’d been sober all these years.


November of 2008 I started Invisiblepeople.tv.


It wasn’t this long thought-out process, maybe because the basic concept had been in me for years. As a nonprofit television producer I was tired of spinning  homeless stories. And I had wrestled around the idea of doing a very ‘raw’ project.

Since I had nothing but a laptop, a camera and an iPhone, not even editing equipment. If I had any money, I would love to edit Invisible people.

Last winter I took a temp job supporting a homeless shelter. Along with making new friends while taping InvisiblePeople.tv my life changed.


A year ago my plan was to move back to LA for a cushy marketing job, start a new band, find a hot wife and vacation in Hawaii. Today, my financial crisis in many ways is worse, but my heart has been changed.


I sometimes dream about getting a normal job, but I know deep down I’d hate it.


In homeless services outreach you never know who you are going to meet. I was called to a park in Pasadena to assist a family. I loaded the father, mother and two babies into the van driving them to our facility.  After we arrived the father was helping me unload the baby stroller from the back of the van.


Without saying anything he pointed to a rock. I thought he was helping me clean out the back of the van so I grabbed it to throw it away. He stopped me, took the rock out of my hand and handed it to his daughter. They are homeless. They live in a park. The only toy he could give his child is a smooth rock.


My heart was wrecked and I have never been the same since.


6. Malcolm Gladwell has written that most homeless people are that way for a very short period of time and that the problems of violence, property damage and emergency room costs that disturb so many people are caused by an extremely small number of people. What is your view on that?


I love what [San Francisco mayor] Gavin Newsom said, “We don’t have a homeless problem. We have a housing problem.”


You are referring to Million Dollar Murray a likeable homeless guy who cost public services over a million dollars, before he died on the street in a drunken stupor.


In Denver it costs $40k to keep someone on the streets and $14k to house them. To the taxpayer that’s a yearly savings of $26k per homeless individual being helped.

This is part of the growing Housing First movement, which I support.


Although controversial, it saves
lives and saves money


But just providing housing is not enough.


The issue is what happens when you house  people who are still on drugs or are mentally ill. Consider this: how do you stay sober when you are crapping behind a dumpster in a McDonalds parking lot?


It’s nearly impossible to stay sober on the streets. Point blank –  unless a person has dignity they are not going to change. Give a person shelter–then work on the ‘issues’


We cannot just throw a chronic homeless person into housing and leave them alone. \ People need tangible social interaction.


My friend Alan Graham is going amazing work housing people in RVs. I am also excited to be working with Common Ground this year. Both at the forefront of ‘housing first’ model.

7. Let’s talk social media. When and how did it catch your attention? Tell me how you got started.


When I was job hunting from St. Louis, for the job that brought me back to Los Angeles. My prospective new boss tweeted, and was tweeting about the interview process, so of course, I looked, and looked, and looked!  I started my account.


Being a TV producer by trade, I started a Twitter experiment. Driving from St. Louis back to Los Angeles, I told the story and used a few tricks to engage people. People started to email me, “where you going?”


The light bulb started to glow and I saw Twitter’s value as a storytelling tool. Good marketing is simply telling a good story.


When I started Invisiblepeople.tv,I used Twitter to market it for not great strategic reason. I did it because Twitter is free and that fit my budget.


I’m your typical front page USA Today recession story. I’ve lost everything. Layoff, after layoff, after layoff, house lost to foreclosure. I did not, and still do not, have an operating budget. I use what I can afford and will give me real-time storytelling ability.


8. What is one of your InvisiblePeople that moved you the most?


I walked under a bridge in Atlanta and met Angela. She’s dying under that bridge, and the best I could do is give her a sandwich. Food is not enough. We need to support people who need help with housing, jobs and health services. Sure,  maybe your support level is making a sandwich. Well then, make a bunch and take them to your local homeless shelter so they can save on their food budget for housing, jobs and health services.


if you wonder how Beth may have ended up under that bridge maybe this will help


9. How have your social media experiences helped homeless people in general and in specific.

I have an agenda. I am after your perceptions. Thing is a perception is a hard thing to measure, yet every now and then I get a glimpse. One day I was getting crazy traffic and clicked on the link that took me to America’s Next Top Model. You don’t have to be a genius to know models and homeless don’t mix. I scrolled down to find a comment left by a girl saying after visiting Invisiblepeople.tv she no longer thinks homeless are bums

Social media has been everything. I mean, I would not be typing this today if it was not for the people I met via social media that helped me. From the road trip to putting food in my fridge, social media changed my life. I am very grateful to everyone.

Now let’s get real. I was an unemployed guy who lost everything. With only a laptop and a cell phone I got the word ‘homeless’ to trend on twitter. Michael Jackson trends, iPhone trends – not HOMELESS – that’s huge! Even better,  probably the coolest thing that has ever happened in homeless cause marketing may be Ford mirroring my content

I search twitter for the word ‘homeless’. Sometimes I get people being ignorant and I educate, and sometimes I find others helping homeless people. Probably the most interesting is this story.


Those are only a few of many examples of how I changed the general public’s view on homelessness.


This last summer’s road trip I was told about 50 homeless kids that didn’t have shoes so they could not go to school. One hour later they all had new shoes. Because I had the courage to do something different and with the help of people on social media housing and food programs have been started. That’s really amazing for a guy who has nothing but twitter to make things happen.

12. Can you tell me a single story that illustrates what social media has done for the homeless?

This may be the best single story.


I have a chapter in Twitterville called "B2Bs are People Too.  If I were to rewrite the book, I would have to expand the chapter on B2B, [business-to-business] because it has grown so massively since June, when the book was finished.

IBM, for example, was the tweetingest company I found last June with over 1000 employee tweeters. Now that number has grown to about 7500 and that's just the IBM employees. The number would be far greater if you included the partners, consultants, customers, analysts, editors and other members of the IBM infrastructure. If you included them, you'd have tens of thousands of IBM community members communicating tens of thousand of times daily. IBM, the third largest technology company in fact is trusting a growing portion to its business to Twitter, where they are realizing significant, measurable and growing favorable results.

Another company, mentioned in my book is Sodexo, North America's largest food service company. Last year they adopted Twitter as an executive recruiting tool, integrating it with their other online tools. Traffic to their job site traffic has tripled and they have saved, I'm told about $350,000 in recruiting ad costs.

Even Pitney Bowes, the postage meter company, is using Twitter to modernize its generally stodgy image.

My favorite B2B story in the book is about tiny United Linen. Located in Bartlesville, Okla., this company was founded by a family during the Great Depression. They took in laundry from neighbors to make ends meet. Now United Linen is the largest restaurant linen and uniform laundry service in a four-state region. They use Twitter in all sorts of ways and it's activities have made happier customers, established the company as a community leader, has given them an emergency customer communications tool, which they used last winter in an ice storm. It has also generated significant coverage in BusinessWeek, Forbes, the Wall Street Journal and other publications.

While companies who use Twitter to reach public markets get more attention, simply because they are trying for public recognition, B2Bs are extremely active and at this time, may be growing faster that consumer-focused companies. You may not know much about what IBM is doing, but IBM doesn't really care. They are using Twitter and other social media tools to talk with their communities online.

I learned about United Linen from Joe Zuccaro, who is better known as the Marketing Consigliere . Joe is passionate and highly knowledgeable about B2Bs and social media. Last year, he started awarding a "B2B Tweeter of the Year Award" and it went to United Linen. When I asked through Twitter for suggestion for my book, Joe suggested the Bartlesville laundry service.

This year, Joe just asked for suggestion for the new B2B Tweeter of the Year and received a note from someone he knew that was crammed with ridicule and scorn;; someone who thinks tweeting is about broadcasting a single message, rather than having ongoing conversations, someone who in my opinion is completely ignorant to the mounting facts and stats, of Twitter''s value in B2B. Facts that decision makers I've talked with at Wells Fargo, Microsoft, SAP, HP and others have noted and embraced.

Joe's a classy guy and doesn't want to name his ignorant colleague. I would have named him and still would. Anyone who goes on the record, using disinformation or a lack of knowledge to defame those who are better informed, should be spotlighted in my opinion.

Anyway, my best to Joe. My repeated thanks for a great story in my book and I look forward to spotlighting whoever Joe selects this year in a future blog post.

When I started exploring Global Neighbourhoods in Twitterville, I never thought I would discover and connect with a Tanzanian chicken farmer turned educator. But there was Mama Lucy Kampton, smiling and warm, having dinner at our home in San Carlos, CA some 10,000 miles  from her home on the rural edges of Arusha, Tanzania, not far from the legendary Mt. Kilimanjaro.

She had come to dinner with Stacey Monk and Sanjay Patel, the co-founders of Epic Change, best-known for producing Tweetsgiving, the annual grassroots fundraising campaign to benefit the children of Shepherds Jr, a school Mama Lucy founded for Tanzanian school children in a country whose government does not provide adequate schools.

Last year, Epic Change slapped together a last-minute, short notice campaign to raise money to replace the building Mama Lucy was using to school about 175 kids when the landlord decided to bulldoze the property. In a two-day period, using blogs and tweets to promote the effort, Epic Change raised about $11,000 from 372 people who gave about $30 each.

A new school was built and the kids, who now have their own Twitter account, engraved the Twitter handles of all 372 donors into a stucco wall at the new school. [You can talk to the kids on Twitter at @ShepherdsJr.]

My connection with all this is that I wrote about Epic Change and Mama Lucy in Twitterville and I often discuss Shepherds Jr and Tweetsgiving in my public talks.

This year, Tweetsgiving went global with a series of events all over the world, each scheduled close to the American Thanksgiving. This year, $30,000 was raised. The funds will be used to for classrooms, a library, cafeteria and a dorm. The former is needed because feeding these children is an essential part of what the school is about and the dorm is needed because several orphans attend Shepherds Jr.

The school is mostly dedicated to giving a good education. Last year it finished first in Tanzania out of 117 schools taking an achievement test, despite the fact that many of the other schools were long-established, privately funded and run by people with more academic credentials than Mama Lucy, who actually holds not formal educator’s credentials. This year, Shepherds Jr has expanded to about 350 students, enabled mostly by Shepherds Jr.

Uneducated herself, Mama Lucy is bursting with passion about education for her kids. Mama Stacey She has put three children through college. That is a journey that started when each was only six-years-old and Mama Lucy had to put them on a bus that traversed and navigated a poor excuse for a road into neighboring Kenya, where her kids would stay for six months to attend real schools.

None of us knew what to expect when our three guests arrived on a rainy night December night at our door, but we somehow found  ourselves hugging and laughing and all talking at once. It was like meeting old friends for the first time and it was all because of social media and the book and we all just felt like we knew and understood each other and shared many of the same values.

Mama Lucy seemed to like our home, but what she liked best was the fire we had going and how it warmed our living room. She was in the Bay Area on part of a whirlwind trip, made possible by Epic Change and Tweetsgiving funds. She and Stacey had spoken in Amsterdam, the Bay Area and DC. In between were visits with friends of Epic Change and that included Paula and me.

Mama Stacey Mama Lucy is essentially a shy and humble woman. She seemed more worried about her English than she needed to be. She told us a few stories with calm and dignity that showed not everyone treated her r these kids with much calm or dignity.

She told us about being treated in an insulting style by a Barclay’s Bank clerk in Tanzania, who she had successfully taken on. ” Some people come to Africa, but they don’t seem comfortable being physically close to Africans. I don’t understand why they come to where we live she told us.

It took a little prodding by Sanjay for her to tell us about an incident at a Tanzanian Game Preserve, where her son had arranged for four busloads of Shepherds Jr kids to visit. The buses of excited children arrived, but the pre-arranged entrance at the gate was denied and the kid were denied entrance.

It seems that some white visitors were enjoying lunch on the veranda and the Preserve administrator did not want to disturb his visiting guests. Apparently, people who had come to see wild animals would find the sight of African children disturbing to their digestive system.

The teachers asked if the kids, could just go in a few at a time, but the request was denied. They asked if it would be okay if the kids came in and promised to not speak. Request denied.

Stacey, at the time, was a volunteer assistant at the school and Mama Lucy asked her to go to talk to the official. Why Stacey? Because she had white skin as did the administrator. Stacey went, but the administrator hid from her. She could see him cowering in the shadows.

These were conversation that touched Paula and me. They were blended into a night where Mama Lucy revealed herself to be an overwhelmingly positive person, appreciating what so many people she has never met have done on behalf of her school project.

This trip was her first to Europe or the US. She visited with some misgiving based on experience such as she had at the bank and the preserve. But she has been touched by how well received she has been.

She does have one misgiving about the US. She thinks we could treat older people with greater respect. In her country, the title “mama” is a term of respect. Here, she sees children calling aunts and uncles by their first names and she considers that disrespectful. She also does not understand why children send off their parents to homes for the elderly. They should bring them into their homes where they can receive love as well as care. She has a point.

Meeting mama Lucy makes me want to do more to help her kids and Epic Change who is committed to finding and helping other Shepherds Jr-type situations.

There are many ways you can help Shepherds Jr. Here are a few that Stacey and I discussed:

  • Money is always appropriate. The best/easiest is through EpicChange.org [link above]. It can be a modest amount. $30 goes a lot further in Tanzania than it does in say, San Carlos, CA.
  • New Books. Mama Lucy is building a library. She would love culturally appropriate children’s books. You can find her Amazon wish list here.
  • Used books. Mama Lucy welcomes any child-appropriate books that your kids may be done with. Just ship to: Mama Lucy Kamptoni, Shepherds Junior School, PO Box 1888, Arusha, Tanzania.[no zip needed]. The bad news is that shipping is costly. he good news is that it is probably tax deductible, because Epic Change is a registered non-profit.
  • Volunteer there. This story began with Stacey Monk being a volunteer teaching assistant. If you have time and inclination, or maybe some teaching talent, Mama Lucy welcomes your help for whatever time you wish to dedicate.
  • Volunteer here. Epic Change is a grassroots international network. Contact Stacey at Epic Change or on Twitter [link above].

Meanwhile, on the list of things Paula and I are thankful for in 2009, is to having had the honor of Mama Lucy, Stacey and Sanjay having been guests in our home.

Where we’re going


[Howard Rheingold. Photo by Oscar Espiritusanto]

Note: This is part part 2 of two parts. You can see Part 1, Where we’ve been here.

This title is just slightly misleading. Howard really offered no predictions of where people and technology is heading in the Conversation Age, and I didn’t try to get him him to make forecasts.

While his writings have displayed more than a little prescience, he is more of a thinker than a futurist. But he did offer some interesting observations about at least one emergent technology and some useful insights into his students at Stanford and UC Berkeley and from there you might draw some conclusions yourself.

Q. You were an early champion of virtual reality, which may not have
taken off as quickly as you forecast. Do you think it is still likely to
evolve? How do you see it being incorporated into social media moving forward?

You win some, you lose some. I can’t really
take credit for being prescient without taking blame for foreseeing events that
have yet to come to pass — may never come to pass.
To be fair to myself, I did
note that truly photorealistic immersive virtual worlds would not exist until
sufficient affordable computation power came along, some time in the early 21st
century. And people like Jeremy Bailenson at Stanford have been doing some
extremely valuable social science research using today’s version of virtual
reality.

There are some fundamental unsolved problems. If you can move
your perceptions around a limitless virtual world, what keeps your body from
slamming into the wall when you try to run toward the horizon? In regard to
social media, I’ve spent enough time in Second Life to see exactly how
seductive to a small portion of the population an immersive virtual world with
photorealistic or Photoshop unrealistic avatars that can not only navigate and
communicate but build and exchange landscapes, buildings, objects with
behaviors can be.

But it’s work to create an avatar and learn how to navigate it and
where the action is. In an infinite landscape, human actitivies seem to take
place far apart. So I don’t see Howard Sunflower such worlds as ever becoming universal.

It’s
NOT the “future of the Web.”

However, I do see them getting less
centralized and easier to use, and people will start inventing uses for them
that we don’t foresee right now, and the population of enthusiasts will grow
from a tiny cult following to a small cyber subculture. There are things you
can do in such environments that you can’t do elsewhere.

[At right--giant sunflowers from Howard's garden. Those suckers are 16 feet tall.]


Q.I’ve argued that social media is
disrupting all institutions, business, government, education, health, etc. Do
you agree or disagree? What is your vision for how technology will make this a
better/world for everyday people 10 or 100 years hence.

Isn’t it evident from what I’ve written that I’ve been immersed in experiencing,
influencing, learning about, and communicating about this disruption precisely
because I think it’s the single most fundamental critical uncertainty of the
present age?


I think “better world” is an
unrealistically rosy way of framing the present situation. We’re in deep shit.
Doug Engelbart and Vannevar Bush saw it coming half a century ago, and the Whole
Earth Catalog started looking at planetary-scale systemic problems decades ago
– which is part of what drew me to it. We have ancient human problems of
tribalism, hatred, and atrocity meeting modern armaments, including WMDs.

We
have global warming, loss of species and habitat, collapse of key populations
like salmon, the energy and food needs of the world population, emergent
epidemics. I’d say that the main goal of the human species ought to be our own
survival. The next 50 years are going to require a lot of problem-solving. The
most powerful tool we have are all those people.

If only enough of them could
be healthy, fed, and educated enough to help us tackle those problems.
Technology and social media and new knowledge about human collective action
can help.

But I don’t want to be quoted as saying that the
technology, the social media themselves are the linchpin. I think the way
people end up using these media,  our degree of knowledge about how our literacy
is connected with a struggle between power and counter-power, the degree of
education of the people who pollute or nourish the infosphere, even plain old
fashioned netiquette — all matter now. I am an anti-determinist.

I believe in
human agency. But there are no guarantees that democracy will win over
totalitarianism, that tools will be used to feed people, that our social and
political and economic institutions and our own minds will be able to cope with
the pace of change that our inventions have helped us bring on ourselves.

Q. You teach at Stanford and UC Berkeley. How has technology changed education and learning since you were at Reed in the 60s?

Education
and learning haven’t changed, but the circumstances under which they
take place are radically different.

The lecture-and-test method goes
back a thousand years, to the days when books were written by hand and
chained to a podium, where a professor stood up and read them. In
recent years, without (I strongly suspect) any real consultation among
faculty about the pedagogical consequences, wireless Internet access
was installed in classrooms and lecture halls around the world. For the
first time, students could look up information to determine whether the
professor really knew what he or she was talking about. Students can now
chat and share information among themselves during lectures and if the
professor is too boring, there is always Facebook or World of Warcraft.

Many professors are in denial about this, and drone on with the same
lecture they’ve delivered for decades. Other professors make extremely
bad use of technology by reading their text-laden PowerPoint slides to
their students. Others simply demand  their students keep
their laptops closed for the duration of class.

Of course, since I
teach social media, I can neither ignore nor prohibit laptop use, so
I’ve taken steps to help my students become mindful of the way they
deploy their attention.

One strategy is to have only the student
co-teaching team keep their laptops open while they are helping me lead
the class; one member of the team makes notes on the wiki, sketching in
top-level headings that the other students will fill in AFTER class,
another member of the team identifies words for the lexicon and adds
them to the wiki (and again the class, as a whole, fills in the
definitions before the next class), and a third member of the team
looks up sites online and projects them (I have three screens in my
classroom at Stanford).

Another strategy — 20% of my students are
allowed to have their laptops open at any time, but it’s up to them to
self-police. I have also made video of my students from my point of
view and from theirs and have shown it to them.

More
profoundly, social media have enabled students to engage in
collaborative inquiry with peers, engaging in online discussions that
are no longer solo performances for the teacher, but engage other
students in digging down into issues that came up in class via forums,
collaborating with each other and me in real time through a Twitter
back channel, reflect on their learning for their own benefit and that
of classmates on their blog, and learn how to learn and compose
collaboratively via the wiki.

The technologies are not used to add
contemporary appeal or techie flashiness but are affordances for a kind
of learning based more in inquiry, collaboration, and discourse than on
trying to detect what is going to be on the test and memorize it.
I
ask my students to read in advance my extensive description of what is
expected of them and to commit themselves in writing to the kind of
participation I ask.
It
has taken me five years, in close consultation with my students, to
come up with a set of procedures that work. It’s tremendously exciting
to see the classroom come alive, and to engage students between class
meetings via their blogs, the forums, and the wiki. Here’s a presentation of one of our class sessions.

Q. Can you tell me what’s on college student
minds these days?

It’s
not easy to get into Stanford or Berkeley these days. By the time I get
them, students are highly trained grade-making machines. They want to
know what’s on the test. They are so institutionalized that they aren’t
even aware of it.

For example, in my open classroom, the students come
in on the first day and take chairs from stacks and arrange them –
with no direction on my part — into rows and columns. If I don’t
intervene, they will do the same thing the second week, and sit in the
same place they chose the first day of class.

I ask them to arrange the
chairs in a circle — there is no back row to hide in in a circle. It
isn’t easy to overcome learned helplessness.

Students are accustomed to
having knowledge delivered to them. But in an era where knowledge,
media, and professions change so rapidly, storing knowledge is not
adequate. Students need to learn how to learn, learn how to evaluate
new media as they come along, learn how to evaluate the way they deploy
their own attention in an always-on world.

They need to learn how to
collaborate, how to find knowledge and how to determine whether what
they have found is credible. A whole set of meta-skills are required by
the times — and traditional university education doesn’t necessarily
introduce those meta-skills. That’s why I’m teaching, and that’s why I
am excited — and when I do it right, why my students are excited — by
the opportunities afforded by technology.



Yesterday, over on Twitter, I asked for suggestions for my SM Global Report and was surprised by the confusion that caused. Some people thought I was offering some sort of proprietary report, perhaps a PDF.

This post is to help me explain and to give me a link I can point to in the future. [If you know all about the SM Global Report and how I use it, just skip this report and come back later.]

The Social Media [SM] Global Report is at the core of what I do. Since 2005, I have interviewed people about how they use social media in their work and lives. In all there have been over 400 interviews with people in 40 countries. These people have varied from CEOs of global enterprises to pioneers in NGOs, elected officials and regime change activists; a cancer victim using Twitter for ideas and support; a member of the Lebanese Parliament using Facebook to talk with constituents while hiding from Hezbollah.

And so on… It began essentially as a business report, but it seems that I am following social media wherever it goes. I am looking for new stories that either inspire others or give pragmatic ideas of new ways social media can be used.

Almost invariably the SM Global Report is at the core of the books and articles I write. People I interview often become subjects for my speaking engagements and when I get a new project, the SM Global Report gets renamed for a period of time. It became “Twitterville Notebook” for a while. when I was working on my recent book.

I am always looking for stories of people who have used social media successfully. It doesn’t matter where, but it most certainly matters how. These are case studies. I write about things that have already happened partly in the hope that it will help others make adopt social media in new ways.

In that light, I rarely–if ever–write about new companies with new tools or APIs. Despite that fact, I get more than a few pitches for stories like that and I get very few pitches for the stories I am really after. When I tweeted yesterday that I wrote about people not companies, I immediately received a few company pitches. So if you are a PR practitioner, please keep that in mind. You can email me with story ideas whenever you like, but it would be best for me if you took the time to click on the SM Global Report category button in my sidebar and read a few of the Reports first.

If you have such a story or an idea on how I can find one please let me know.

Where we’ve been

[Howard Rheingold in his backyard giant sunflower patch. Photo by Shel Israel]

Howard Rheingold
is a founding father of the Conversational Era. He has spent much of his past 40 years exploring the impact and promise of the
convergence of technology and the human brain. He is a student of the many people, incidents and trends that have brought us to today, and as a prolific thinker, writer and speaker, he has contributed significantly to the body of knowledge and thought.

He’s not sure just how many books and articles he has authored or collaborated on, since 1970,  but Amazon offers 72 titles with his byline.  Two of these books, The Virtual Community
[2000] and Smart Mobs [2003] have
profoundly influenced my thinking and writing over the past half dozen years and if you happened to be into social media he is among the early pioneers who blazed the trail the rest of us have followed.
He has been a friend & colleague of many of the thinkers and doers who have delivered us to today and in many cases he can say he had been there and part of the collaborating team that did that. He has also been often prophetic in seeing the seeds that began as visions and have since become reality.

Arizona-born in 1947, he graduated Reed College in Portland, Oregon, then moved to the San Francisco Bay Area, where he became an integral part of America’s most controversial Renaissance Era. He drank the original KoolAid. He also dabbled at Xerox PARC, the legendary tech
experimental tech center where, among other innovations, the personal computer’s graphical interface was developed. He started writing professionally in 1970 and has rarely stopped for long.

He was editor of the Whole Earth Catalog Millenium Edition, an almanac that supported the
counter-culture lifestyle. Founded by thinker-enterpreneur Stuart Brand, Whole Earth Catalogs were a grassroots compendium of alternative lifestyle resources. A young
hippie fruitarian of that time named Steve Jobs would later describe the Catalog as both the forerunner to the
Worldwide Web and Google.

Rheingold was an early and enthusiastic member of the San Francisco-based
” Well,” the first internet-based
community to gain widespread notice and momentum. His speaking and writing about it, particularly in The Virtual Community introduced a great number of people to the vision of social media for the first time.

These days he continues to write and speak on issues related to the human brain and technology–his central focus throughout his adult life. He also teaches courses at both Stanford University and the University of California at Berkeley.

I have divided this interview into two parts. In this first part, Howard reflects and illuminates on what has happened so far. Most of Part 2 will discuss his thoughts on tomorrow, partly by discussing what he sees in his students.

One word of caution: this is not a quick read. It is filled with links to some of the people and events that have brought about the Conversation Age and I hope that you will follow some of these links to see and learn. Maybe it will give you some ideas on what you can contribute to tomorrow.


Q. You attended Reed College in the mid 60s, an elite liberal arts college known for free thought and lifestyle. How did that experience shape who you have become?

It’s very astute to start with this question. My relationship with Reed was co-evolutionary: Reed seems to send out a
kind of invisible signal that attracts a certain kind of person, and the people
who are able to stick it out (very high dropout rate) tend to remain “Reedies”
for life.

I was a National Merit Scholar, which meant I could
have gotten into any university, but Reed was the only place I applied! I
originally got wind of it because the character in Kerouac’s Dharma Bums who
was based on Gary Snyder who went to Reed. Snyder, more than Kerouac, was a hero of
mine when I was 16 years old, so that was about all I needed to know. In
retrospect, I’d say that the dominant characteristics of a person meant for
Reed are:

a.  A stubborn commitment to
think for oneself

b.  A deep and broad
interest in texts and intellectual discourse

c.  Because of the first two
characteristics, we were mostly the smart weird kids in our high schools

d.  We dropped out of the
brand-name college game

Reed alumni magazine did an article on me,
written by Wired [Howard was founding exec editor of Wired.com]  writer and fellow Reed alumni Gary Wolf.


The Reed  years were 1964-68 for me, so
these were also tumultuous times. And I took a lot of LSD. I want to be clear
on this: Many of my friends got in serious trouble or died because of drugs
(and many more because of one drug: alcohol), so I’m not an advocate of
indiscriminate use of recreational drugs. But LSD was an extremely important
influence on my thinking.

I didn’t drop acid and go to concerts. I
dropped acid and stayed in my room and painted, read — I read most of the
Bible on acid — and explored other dimensions with my fellow travelers.

In
particular
1968 – the Tet offensive, Prague Spring, China’s Red Guards and Cultural Revolution; May revolt in Paris;
Chicago, and assassinations of RF Kennedy and ML King; riots in American cities. We
weren’t participants in these events, but the world stage seemed particularly
apocalyptic. I became convinced that we were living in times that would decide
the future of the human experiment, and just as I went to Reed because I wanted
to engage in a meaningful and deep dialogue with others about the curriculum
(the sex, drugs, and rock&roll were part of it, but were always secondary
to the intellectual quest), I left Reed and entered the world with a conviction
that what I said and did with my education would matter not just to me but to
everybody.

When I got involved with people I met from the
Well, my wife, who I met at Reed  said: “This is just
like Reed. A bunch of intelligent misfits have found each other and are going
to town.”


Q. The common thread that seems to tie your considerable
writing and thought together is the interaction of the human brain and
technology.  It seems to have developed in the early 80s between your work
with The Whole Earth Catalog and your involvement with  The Well. Can you walk me through how that developed?


The brain and technology–and evolution and consciousness–were
the subjects of my undergraduate thesis. One of the things that LSD taught me
was that what we think we know about our minds is tiny compared to what we have
to learn. I felt technology would open a new front, along with that of
chemical agents (it’s too bad that legitimate psychedelic research was shut
down), and the approaches pointed to by Eastern mysticism, in understanding
consciousness — which seemed to me to be the essential stuff of which the
universe is made.

I had what I later learned I could call a “noetic”
conviction
about these conjectures, and was determined to somehow add to our body
of knowledge about our minds and how we could control our minds better.


3.
You coined the term “Virtual Community” and it became the title of one of
your most influential books. It’s first chapter talked about the
Parenting group in The Well.
Your stories in that chapter are strikingly close to stories I found in Twitter.  Can you   compare/contrast The Well and Twitter?
What has remained the same and what has changed?


Absolutely true! In my first months on Twitter, I told fellow Well veterans Twitter felt just like
the Well. While it would be a
categoric error to call the Twitter population in general a community, it was
clear that communities were forming there. People were getting to know each
other, strangers were engaging in discussions with each other; new forms of fun
were being invented; new ways to use the platform to communicate socially like the hashtag and retweet were being invented by users; people were exchanging
and reciprocating knowledge; social capital was accumulating in some groups.

At the same time, Twitter
was totally different. In the Well, each user might participate in different
topic threads in different conferences (forums), but the discussions were
centered on topics and were like places where a group of people accumulated. In
each discussion, we paid attention to each other. In Twitter there is no
such social symmetry. There are no topics, outside of hashtags and each person
sees a different group of others.

Despite, and because of, this asymmetry,
Twitter always had a social vibrancy.

Another similarity is the
sense among the users that what we were co-creating with the Twitter founders
would take on new forms as we went along. The Well was built on Unix, so coders
and users were in dialogue, but with the Twitter’s open API and the explosion
of third-party applications, that co-evolving relationship seems to be in
overdrive.

Twestival, 300,000 tweets/hour from Tehran, the Twitpic of the
airplane that landed in the Hudson — events that change our minds about what
Twitter can be used for seem to be happening with increasing frequency

Q. For the benefit of our studio audience, just what
do you mean when you say the computer is an amplifier of the human mind?

I’ve learned that most people don’t know much history, and those who
know it seem to quickly forget it. Until a couple of mavericks who were not at
all related to the existing computer industry started thinking seriously about
using digital computers to augment human intellect and create new communication
media, this was a crazy idea.

Computers were for scientific calculations and
business data processing. But JCR Licklider [computer time-sharing], Doug Engelbart [the mouse], Bob Taylor [the internet], Alan
Kay
[graphical interface] thought differently. What if we could move words around on a screen by
pointing at them, instead of retyping the whole page? What if we could create
documents as outlines, then expand and contract them so we can zoom from big
picture to detail? What if we could command computers by clicking on icons instead
of typing commands? What if we could link texts, documents, and different media
and move smoothly from one to another by clicking on the link?

By automating
these low-level symbol manipulation tasks, would that free the brain to take in
larger pictures, see relationships between micro and macro levels that couldn’t
be observed, try many more hypotheses than old methods afforded? All these
capabilities seem obvious today, but not only were they not obvious until
Engelbart’s Mother of All Demos in 1968. I told the story of this creation of
revolutionary innovation by a small group of outsiders in my book, Tools
for Thought
. I started using a modem when I first started exploring personal
computer culture in the early 1980s, but didn’t join the Well until after Tools
for Thought was published in 1985.

I started out to make a living as a writer when
I was 23, in 1970. I had a typewriter, a telephone, and a library card.
Comparing the tools I had for thinking, researching, communicating, organizing
back then with what I have now, it’s like starting out my career with a horse
and buggy and now I have my own 747.

It took me about 5 seconds to look up the
passage of Engelbart’s
that originally fired me up, and to copy it. And I did
it sitting here in my garden, via laptop and WiFi. Keeping in mind what I said
previously about my interests in brain and technology and my conviction
regarding this historical moment and my role and responsibility to it, it still
makes sense to me as an answer to your question:

By
“augmenting human intellect” we mean increasing the capability of a
man to approach a complex problem situation, to gain comprehension to suit his
particular needs, and to derive solutions to problems. Increased capability in
this respect is taken to mean a mixture of the following: more-rapid
comprehension, better comprehension, the possibility of gaining a useful degree
of comprehension in a situation that previously was too complex, speedier
solutions, better solutions, and the possibility of finding solutions to
problems that before seemed insoluble. And by “complex situations” we
include the professional problems of diplomats, executives, social scientists,
life scientists, physical scientists, attorneys, designers — whether the
problem situation exists for twenty minutes or twenty years. We do not speak of
isolated clever tricks that help in particular situations. We refer to a way of
life in an integrated domain where hunches, cut-and-try, intangibles, and the
human “feel for a situation” usefully coexist with powerful concepts,
streamlined terminology and notation, sophisticated methods, and high-powered
electronic aids.
Man’s population and gross
product are increasing at a considerable rate, but the complexity of his
problems grows still faster, and the urgency with which solutions must be found
becomes steadily greater in response to the increased rate of activity and the
increasingly global nature of that activity. Augmenting man’s intellect, in the
sense defined above, would warrant full pursuit by an enlightened society if
there could be shown a reasonable approach and some plausible benefits.


In 2002, you authored Smart Mobs, which has been critically acclaimed for it’s
foreshadowing of social media. Among the incidents that most impressed me was
how street people used mobile SMS to out maneuver police & eventually
overthrow the government.  When the Iran election took place in June of
this year, did you see a certain similarity? How did has technology involved to
empower people. Where do you see/hope it is ultimately headed?

Let me start with the conclusion and then unpack it:
With a billion people on the Internet and 4 billion mobile phones, the ability to
gain information, to process it computationally, to organize collective action
with others, to publish and broadcast has been radically democratized — but
whether or not that democratized communication and coordination capability will
lead to more or less democracy is not a function of the technology but of the
social, political, economic activities of the people who use it.

The events in
Iran should be an object lesson that access to digital media and networks
guarantees that it will be impossible to keep the world from witnessing massive
oppression, but does not guarantee the victory of forces of counterpower who
seek liberty from oppression. Power always wakes up and mobilizes when
counterpower threatens it.

The Iranian regime broadcast disinformation. They
shut down Internet access. They ran cloaked proxy servers as honey pots to
catch dissidents. So far, they are succeeding.

In China, the Great Firewall and
tens of thousands of human cyber-police make sure that over a quarter billion Chinese
netizens enjoy the power to do anything they want online as long as it doesn’t
challenge the authority of the party.

The victory of smart mobs is not
guaranteed by the power of the tools they hold in their hands. That’s just
magical thinking. However, the events I described in my book were real. There
were other forces at work in the Philippines — there are always other forces
at work — but the SMS-organized People Power II demonstrations were a large
part of what brought down the Estrada regime. The elections of heads of state
were tipped away from the frontrunner through smart-mobbed demonstrations and
get out the vote campaigns in Korea and Spain.

Where do I see it headed? My experiences have
convinced me that the most important focus for public attention right now
should shift to
the literacies that bring power to those who possess them and
leave behind those who don’t know how to use their telephone as a medical
instrument, educational medium, social radar, political organizing tool.

Chip
fabrication plants, teenage personal computer wizards and moguls, networks of
fiber optics and satellites have played and will continue to play their parts
in the distribution of computing and communication power to every human on
Earth.

But now that devices with such enormous untapped power are in the hands
of so many, the factor that will most powerfully shape the resulting social
institutions is literacy. My definition of “literacy” builds the
thinking of Neil Postman: I mean the inward-looking skill that enables an
individual to read and write, to decode and encode messages with a medium, and
I also refer to the external community to which this skill provides entrance.
As I’ve written recently in regard to “Crap Detection 101,” the literacies I am talking about are not just about individual empowerment, but
are crucial to the health of the commons.

We can’t stop the Web from being
overwhelmed with misinformation, disinformation, hoaxes, urban legends, spam,
porn, porn-spam by controlling the sources – the Web is powerful precisely
because there are no controls on what people put on it. We can only guarantee
the ultimate health of the Web as a source of useful and trustworthy
information by encouraging the spread of crap detection skills. That, to me, is
the most important meaning of the “social” in “social
media” — that we are not just amplifying our minds and showing off for
each other, we are learning and organizing, creating, innovating, building,
liberating together.

To me, individualism versus collectivism is a toxically
false dichotomy. Humans are humans because of our individual capabilities, the
evolved genius of what we’ve taught each other to do with our expanded
forebrains. But the “taught each other to do” part is crucial. Our
individual genius would not only be useless, it wouldn’t exist without our
social interchanges.



[Janis Krums takes & makes his shot for the Florida Lakewood Ranchers , an amateur league team. He also took another kind of shot in January 2009, which you probably saw. photo by Angie Tyler Jula]

It’s one of my favorite stories in Twittterville. In January 2009, Janis Krums, the a 23-year-old entrepreneur from Sarasota, Florida was on a ferry crossing the Hudson River when US Air Flight 1549 careened from the skies, skidding to a halt on the river about 200 yards from the ferry and immediately began to sink as passengers poured out onto the wings.

Janis whipped out his iPhone and took the photo below, which you have probably seen. He handed the phone to another passenger and then assisted in the rescue of a flight attendant who had broken both her legs and needed assistance getting off the plane.

Helping the attendant to safety, Krums got his iPhone back. It was ringing and when he picked up he was surprised to find he was talking to MSNBC and his voice was being carried live on national TV. Viewers were looking at the photo he had taken less than 30 minutes earlier.

In Twitterville, I argued that the incident changed the relationship between professional and amateur journalists; that it has begun to braid the two together on social media venues. I predicted that braided journalism is how most people will consume news in the near future.

It also has changed Janis Krums. The following is an update on what he has been up to since that unintended moment on the Hudson River. He is simultaneously starting two business in two separate categories, one of which has been a passion for years. The second, something called InboxAlarm would probably have not happened had he not happened to be crossing a river at a specific moment in time; and if my favorite social media platform not been victimized by a DDOS attack that rendered it inoperable for several days in early summer.

Please see my recent interview with him below.

Flight 1549

Q. How has the incident changed your life?

I am associated with an event that changed the perception of
citizen journalism and the evolution of news and media. The coolest part is to
see that my one tweet changed the way that CNN, Fox News, and others interact
with their viewers. They are actively engaged with viewers now, and seek the opinions
in realtime from all the available resources.

Plus, I have a great story to tell at
parties!

Q. How active were you in social media before the “Hudson River Miracle”
incident? How many follower/following did you have going in to that day? How
many do you have now? How much time did you spend on social media before the
incident. How much now?

Before the incident I was exploring all the different
services and seeing which one made sense for me. I had about 170 followers
before the incident. Now I have almost 5,800. Before the incident, I was spending maybe 20 minutes a day on updates. I think right after I
was spending a lot of time. Now I have learned some tricks and services (su.pr, tweetdeck, tweetie 2) that I use to
monitor and use the different sites more efficiently.

Q. When I interviewed you for Twitterville, you were planning working on
Elementz a nutritional enhancement drink for professional athletes. How long have
you been working on it? How is it doing?

We started a year ago with the idea of what we wanted to do.
At this point we have finalized 5 custom formulations and are finalizing the
paperwork to produce the first two products, Vanilla and Chocolate Whey
Protein. We have some very influential people on board and will be making some
really cool announcements in the near future. You can check out our Facebook
page
for the latest news.


7. More recently, you announced InboxAlarm.com. Can you
tell me what it does and how you got the idea for it?

InboxAlarm is burglar alarm for your email inbox. You are
able to create decoy emails that can be as simple as fake password information
or custom emails that cater to your specific security concern. After creating
an email, you send it to one of your Janis personal emails addresses, open it once,
and then forget about it. It sits in your archives until someone opens it. Once
opened, you are instantly notified by a text message that there has been a
breach.

We got the idea after the Twitter breach happened. In that
case the hacker had days to gather information and was able to go from one
employee’s email account all the way up to the CEO’s.

We thought that there should
be a way for you to protect yourself in the case someone breaks into your
inbox. There are other high profile examples; Sarah Palin getting hacked; the
latest phishing attack, and countless others that don’t make national
news.


8. Is InboxAlarm potentially a new business for you, or is it just a
one-off from Elementz Nutrition?

InboxAlarm has the potential to be a new business for Eric
and I. It is too early to tell how it will go, but the initial reaction has
been very positive.


Q. How have sales gone since you announced InboxAlarm?

We have steady sales up to this point. We got some initial
press from PCmag.com
and BNET, which helped the site’s exposure. As well as local Sarasota coverage )
We will be focusing on a major marketing push in the coming weeks.


Q. You have previously told me your two passions are health and social media.
Can you compare and contrast starting businesses serving in the two industries?
For example how are the the process and time-to-market similar or different? o

It’s been very interesting to see the evolution of both
Elementz Nutrition and InboxAlarm. For Elementz we had the concept few years
ago, but only last year said, lets start the process and develop supplements
that we can be proud to stand behind.

We were very naive in our projected
timeline to get the products out into the market. We thought that it would take
few months to research, develop, test, etc the formulations. That estimate was
way off, it took us around a year to finalize the formulas. Right now we are
finalizing everything with our manufacturer.

However, with InboxAlarm, we had the idea in July and were
able to launch the initial site during the second week of September. We had the
core functionality thought out in the first day and after that just kept
refining until we thought it was good enough to be released to the public. I agree with Reid Hoffman’s observation: “If you’re not somewhat
embarrassed by your 1.0 product launch, then you’ve released too late.”

We wanted to get it out as soon as possible and then see what the customers did and didn’t
like. We’ve improved the sign-up process and have couple of
other improvements that are directly linked to the feedback from our
users.

No matter how different the market, at the end of the day
it’s about selling and getting the word out about your product. It doesn’t
matter what industry you are in, if you don’t move product, you will not be
around for too long.

Jack Kennedy was president when I entered college. Like Obama today, he had a great impact on the hearts and minds of young people. In Kennedy’s case, he introduced a concept of volunteerism through programs like VISTA [Volunteers in Service to America] and the Peace Corps. The attitude that we can do something to make a difference for a good cause or people in need has stayed with many of us through our lives.

When I met Jessica Evans in Vancouver last month, I was reminded of that volunteer attitude when she told me the story of Timeraiser where she has donated over 100 hours of her time in a little more than a year and how she has helped the organization expand into social media.

Timeraiser is a Canadian organization formed by the Framework Foundation. It gets corporate sponsors  finance their acquisition of selected works by local artists. Then it holds a silent auction, where mostly people, mostly in their 20s and 30s, bid their time–instead of money–to acquire a piece of art. The funding sponsors display the art in their offices for a year or so, while the volunteer works off the time pledged.

Most of the volunteer work is focused on using the professional skills of the volunteers, rather than ladling soup in food bank kitchens.

Since it started in 2004, Timeraiser has held these auctions in all major Canadian cities and has generated more than 45,000 volunteer hours for more than
250 nonprofits and has supported local artists to the tune of over $300,000.

Jessica Evans, 30 is one of those 45,000 volunteers, she is an IT professional at a Jess-54-web(2) Vancouver-based software company by day and has boundless energy for other activities. It was literally a rocky road she traveled that took her to both Vancouver and Timeraiser.

She tells her story in this interview:

Q. You spend much of your free time in outdoor physical activities such as bike
riding and something called “bouldering.” Just what is that, and when and how did
you get into it?

Bouldering is a style of rock climbing
– literally climbing on large boulders without a rope. Your landing is protected by “bouldering pads”-
high-density foam mats similar to those used in gymnastics. It’s a great way to
climb completely free and push your limits.

I started climbing in 2001 – yes,
I think you could say I’ve traveled extensively to boulder. At the height of job dissatisfaction and
restlessness when I lived in Toronto, I
called myself out on my dream to live on the road and climb. I blogged the entire experience from the inception of the idea where I used up my
health benefits before giving my notice, through the emotional challenges and
steep learning curve while living on the road. There’s also advice on the art of living on a few dollars
a day.

It was an amazing experience and
one of unexpected personal growth. I lasted
almost 6 months, living on the road camping and climbing by myself.

Q  So you boulder climb alone? It doesn’t involve the teamwork and
interdependent teamwork of technical rock climbing. Why did you choose it?

I think you could say that
bouldering chose me. When I was on My
Big Roadtrip, I had my gear for rope climbing too but found that it was easier
to boulder since you don’t need to search for a dedicated partner. In roped climbing, you literally place your
life in the hands of the other person. I
found that not knowing my climbing partner well enough to fully trust them made
it tough to focus. I ended Jessica 2 up bouldering
more and more, either by myself or trying to get in with a group that was out. By the end of the trip I found that I was a
“boulderer,” and now I very rarely rope up to climb.

Sure, I traveled alone and I’ve
gone on some solo bouldering trips since. There’s a bit of teamwork involved – the energy of the group really
affects if you’re able to focus on the moves.
It’s so much better, and even a bit easier, if there’s a good group of
people.

Q. When, how and why did you discover Timeraiser?

I crash landed in Vancouver after the road trip and when I heard
about the Timeraiser in 2008, I saw it as a way to get more involved in the
community of the city I had settled in and had grown to love. Besides, I thought it sounded cool. I like art, especially by local artists, and I
had been meaning to volunteer.

It’s a mashup of silent art
auction and volunteer fair – there are representatives from local nonprofit
agencies, and about 25 pieces of local artwork.
The bidding opens for an hour and participants bid with a pledge of
volunteer hours instead of money. Too
cool.

Q. What appealed to you about Timeraiser, since there are so many other options
where you can volunteer your time?

One of the featured agencies at the Vancouver Timeraiser was Big Sisters. Being a Big Sister was something on my life
to-do list, and it was just so easy to go to the Timeraiser event and talk to a
representative in person. After talking
to someone face-to-face, there was a more natural commitment to follow up.

You could say that I fell in love with the concept at the
Timeraiser event. It was far cooler than I
had expected. Bidding on artwork gave me a taste of a
society I may never be a part of – but the concept of Timeraiser makes it fun
and easy to get involved.

Q. Can you walk me through the process in which you volunteered through the the
Timeraiser silent auction for Big Sisters and how you obtained the photo?

After talking to the agencies at
Timeraiser, I was pretty excited at all the volunteer opportunities that suited
my skills. I ended up getting the
winning bid on a photograph by a local artist  [Miklos LeGrady] and I fulfilled my pledge over the
following year by volunteering as a Big Sister. Donating time goes so far and
you can see the impact you’re having on the community. It’s more fulfilling than, say, writing a
check, though if you can afford that, go for it!

We volunteers are given a full year to complete our pledges. At this year’s Timeraiser, I received my artwork.

Q. I understand you introduced social media components to Timeraisers. Can you
tell me how and why you did that?

Last spring, Timeraiser sent out a
message needing volunteers for planning the next two Timeraiser events in Vancouver. You could say I was getting hooked on
volunteering and was happy to spread the word.

I applied for the position of
Media & Awareness Leadership and my pitch was all social media. How can we reach our target demographic? Well, I’m a member of the target demographic
and I’m always online. I could see the
need to leverage Twitter as well as Facebook fan pages.

We’re getting to a point on the
Web these days where people search Twitter to connect with a business entity,
and Timeraiser needed to represent.  I also brought us onto LinkedIn and worked
with Timeraiser employees to implement the Facebook fan page.

Q. Got an interesting story to share that happened on Twitter involving
Timeraisers?

The entire “Tweeting for
Charity” experience has been interesting.
I’ve been online since the local BBS days back in the mid-90s. Twitter is the online vehicle to reconnect with people
locally and in person, or globally due to our common interests. I’m not looking to network or promote myself
as a climber or a Project Manager, so getting out there to talk about something
I feel so passionately about – Timeraiser – feels quite natural.

One constant I’ve experienced
while engaging in social media for charity is that when I explain the concept
of Timeraiser to people, if they’re interested, they’re excited like me and
eager to help. It’s important to reach
as many people as possible to build the network of eager excited people.

I have to say it was powerful to
watch the word spread and excitement grow along with the network. We ended up selling the event out, which was
an incredible accomplishment. A CBC
reporter saw a retweet about the Vancouver Timeraiser and picked up our story the
day before the event. Members of the
blogging community posted up about the Timeraiser and some had tickets to give
away via their sites. I think everyone
worked together – Team Twitter.

Q. How has social media changed Timeraiser? What additional potential do you
see?

It was very valuable to tap into the local, grassroots media in Vancouver. Getting the word out via local bloggers is
the way to go. Civic Footprint (Timeraiser’s sister nonprofit) is now working on social media strategies for other
Timeraiser cities, to connect via Twitter and social media.

In the Spring, I’ll be leveraging
Twitter again to connect with the local art community. Artists selected for the Timeraiser are paid
market value for their work. In 2009, 20
of the 25 selected artists were from BC.
In 2010, I’d like to see that extend to 25/25.

Also, it would be great if we could
get a participant to blog their experience fulfilling their pledge, so we can
all follow along. I’ll see if I can put
that into place. @Timeraiser_couv is still
the only account dedicated to the Timeraiser, but I hope to see the other
cities follow suit. I’m excited to see
how next year unfolds, since I can incorporate what I learned this year.

Q. I understand that you found romance on Twitter. Can you tell me just what
happened and how has it worked out so far?

That’s quite the bonus, I know! The
first networking event I attended as @Timeraiser_couv was a Meetup and I was
looking for others with @ Twitter IDs on their name badges. I ended up clicking with a guy there – I
remember that I could read him quite well and found him intriguing. We talked about cycling and I sent him an @
from my personal account, not Timeraiser!
When I got home, he had sent me a DM to request a coffee to “learn more
about that charity stuff you do.” We’ve
been hanging out since. You could say we
get along quite well.

Q. Additional comments.

I’m not climbing as much as I used to and it’s amusing
because I made the move out to BC to climb full-time. Dreams change over time, and I got to see my
2009 dream of selling out the Vancouver Timeraiser come true.Timeraiser helped me Commit to Vancouver, and now I’ll never leave.

Life on the road always meeting new people prepped me
for this.

NOTE: This is the second of a two-part interview with corporate communications guru Shel Holtz. You can read Part 1 here.

Can you give me some insight into your views on
how social media is changing the role of the professional communicator?

One of
the myths of social media is that the role of the communicator is completely
changed. I would argue that some dimensions of the communicator’s role have
changed, and they are significant.

Other dimensions, though, continue just as they were. Social
media is an addition to the business communication environment. It has NOT completely replaced the environment.

For example, media relations continues to
be important. Despite assertions that the media are irrelevant, research
continues to demonstrate a considerable amount of trust placed in local news
media, both print and electronic. The behind-the-scenes work of communicators
that is never visible to the general public – like negotiation with activist
groups, in-depth audience research, relationship- and alliance-building with
strategic constituents –  will continue as before.

Now that we have the
“in-addition-to-not-instead-of” argument out of the way, let’s talk about how
the role of the communicator is changing thanks to social media. Or, perhaps I
should say “should change,” since in many organizations, these new requirements
for communications haven’t yet taken root.

The most significant change is the
notion that communication is the crafting of one-way top-down messages. While
there is still a role for some of that, communicators must equally be prepared
to facilitate conversation. Some of the skills required include community
identification, building, and moderation; one-to-one
engagement and message monitoring.

Coordinating the organization’s social
media efforts is another vital role for communicators, ensuring, for example, that employees all have accurate, timely information they can tap into when
engaged in their own conversations with friends, families and online
communities.

Such coordination also ensures a rogue business unit doesn’t do
something inappropriate in the social media space that colors the reputation of
the entire organization. Communicators also need to know what new channels are
emerging and be ready to monitor them and communicating through them should the
evidence suggest they have become important.

And communicators must be able to
demonstrate the effectiveness of their efforts. While there are many points of
view about the ability to measure social media, there is always a way to note
how an effort has paid off, particularly if you knew what your goals were for
that effort at the outset.   Another communications industry issue is the
continuing consolidation of traditional media.

How does this impact the
professional communicator? I don’t see this as a new issue. Media have always
gone through consolidation and change. Television was a new medium. The changes
in the magazine industry of 25 years ago – from general publications like Life
and Look, to specialized, niche publications, like Ferret World – also required
communicators to rethink their approaches. Email – nearly 20 years in the
business world – introduced new marketing opportunities (both good and awful).

But, how often do you see Burma Shave-like roadside promotions these
days? Communications has always been about adaptation. Smart communicators have
always watched the landscape to detect the shifts and tap into the channels to
which audiences are paying attention. Anybody who keeps all their eggs in one
basket (e.g., television) isn’t very good at his or her job. One reason
marketers are embracing channels like YouTube and Twitter is that they
recognize the declining influence of some traditional channels like newspaper
and television advertising and the migration of attention from those media to
newer ones. Concurrent with this, of course, is the need for communicators to
embrace the practices that work in these new media.

Simply transferring the
same messages to the new media – like running press releases through corporate
blogs or trying to deliver marketing messages through Facebook – won’t work.

Solid professionals in the communication business know this intrinsically. Less
professional communicators are surprised.

Simultaneous to all this, is the
relentless emergence of social media people. Where do these new “reporters” fit
into the world of corporate communications? As with everything else, citizen
journalists represent challenges and opportunities. The challenges include
not necessarily getting a heads-up that someone is reporting on
you, and not necessarily getting called for fact-checking or comment on a story about you.

In short,
citizen reporters don’t abide by a code of conduct that you could generally take for granted with “professional journalists,” trained, to report through an hierarchy that
includes seasoned editors, and getting paid for their work.

With
major events, the number of reporting outlets will exceed any organization’s
ability to manage its interactions as they have in the past. While all
reporters have some degree of bias, citizen journalists often don’t even
strive for objectivity.

Companies also need to watch for attacks on their
brands. The recent viral blog displaying images of WalMart shoppers is a great
example.

Consequently, companies must broaden their monitoring and find
ways to communicate that potentially reach these individuals as well as their
audiences.

However, if organizations see only the threat and not the benefits
of citizen journalists, they’re missing huge opportunities to tell their
stories. Blogger outreach is just the tip of the iceberg for engaging people
and providing them with things to report that interest them and their
readers/listeners/viewers.

You and Neville Hobson have completed nearly 500 For
Immediate Release
podcasts. How has your content and audience emerged since
you started back in January 2005?

In addition to the 480 episodes we’ve produced of
Hobson & Holtz, we’ve also released many interviews, book reviews, and
speeches. Since Hobson & Holtz is a show that focuses on what’s happening
now, the evolution tracks the changes to social and other new media. For
example, we talked quite a bit about Second Life a few years ago; today,
virtual worlds get mentioned far less frequently. Now, we spend a fair amount of
time talking about Twitter, though.

Another change: We spend less time making
the case for businesses to engage in social media and more on the various ways
they can do so. Fewer and fewer companies need to convince management that some
kind of engagement is required. (Statistics bear this out, by the way, with
most research indicating the majority of companies plan to increase their
social media spending) .

The audience is pretty much the same, though. They’re mostly early-adopter
communications leaders with a healthy proportion of non-communicators who are
just interested in the topic. For example, one of our frequent commenters,
Clarence Jones, works in retail. We also have a few CEOs among our listeners.

You’ve authored or co-authored six business communications books. How has the trade book publishing business changed over the years? What impact
do you think social media is having on the future of books?

To be honest, I haven’t noted any
change at all to the trade book publishing business from the author
perspective. The process is pretty much unchanged. Sales numbers also look
about the same. I also don’t see social media having any kind of impact on book
sales. On the other hand, the move toward digital (which goes way beyond just
social media) will see some copies moving to ebook devices like the Kindle.

I
don’t see this affecting business titles in the short term, however, since most
people who buy business books like to display them on their office bookshelves
(this according to more than one publisher is an important motivator for
business title purchases).

I also don’t see a complete end to hard-copy books.
Let’s be realistic: Would you take your $300 Kindle on to the beach and risk
dropping it in the sand when you doze off? There’s something to be said for the
$8 paperback that (a) won’t break when you drop it and (b) you can share with
someone else when you finish reading it.

If you were to advise someone
just now entering into the field of PR or corporate communications, what would
you tell him or her?

I’d say that this is one of the most exciting times in
history for getting into this business and that the opportunities are greater
than ever.

Then I’d note that the universities are not necessarily teaching
communication students what they need to know to thrive in a communications job;
that they should pay attention to skills like community moderation, search engine
optimization, social media monitoring and measurement, and the like.

I’d also advise them to get involved before they start sending resumes, completing
applications and going out on interviews. If they can demonstrate their passion
and skill with a blog, a podcast, a Facebook profile, a Twitter account, or
some other combination of channels, the jobs just may find them.

Additional
comments?

One of the most interesting aspects of being a realist is that I find
myself sometimes attacked by both extremes. The social media purists don’t
think I understand that social media changes everything. (It doesn’t; nothing
changes everything.) You should hear the purists when I say there’s still a
role for the traditional press release!

Yet research by the Society for New
Communication Research [SNCR]
proves there is.

On the other hand, traditional
communicators and business leaders think I’ve gone over the deep end and assign
too much weight to social media. (I don’t; it’s critically important.) For
example, I don’t think the organizational structures of old-guard companies
will dramatically change because of social media.

The design group will still
design the products, the manufacturing group will still handle production, and
the marketing group will still drive sales. However, I believe the adoption of
social media inside companies will allow for more seamless interaction and
collaboration within those structures, altering the way work gets done. This
viewpoint doesn’t seem to satisfy either of the extremes (either everything
changes or nothing changes).

But I’ve been watching the impact of online
communication on organizations since 1985, and I think I have a pretty good
handle on it. Based on that, I’d advise people that social media is not the end
of the evolution; it’s merely the spot on the continuum where we now reside.
More evolution is on the way. Like the Boy Scouts say, be prepared.

[Author, Communications Pro Shel Holtz. Photo by Shel Israel]

NOTE–This is the first of a two-part interview with Shel Holtz. He simply had too many useful perceptions to share for me to be able to cut it down into one blog post. If you are a communications professional you really should read this one through.

When controversies rage in social media, as they so often do, Shel Holtz is frequently a voice of calm moderation.  He doesn’t avoid them, but he is usually late to the conversation and when he joins it he adds value by showing a balanced perspective.

A career communications professional who has sat in agency and corporate seats, a former journalist and a podcast pioneer, Holtz has spent his entire adult life in the communications business. He sees issues with a balanced perspective.

Author of six books and a frequent public speaker, that balance shows that he’s picked up a fair amount of wisdom. Shel has been at this social media stuff longer than most people. My view and his do not always coincide. Sometimes we outright disagree.

But his thoughtful, example-filled way of expressing his view always gets my respect and the respect of just about everyone I know.

This is among the longest of my SM Global Reports. I have chosen do do very little trimming because so much of what Shel has to say is worth hearing. If you are a communications professional, it should be required reading.

Last time I interviewed you was in 2005 for Naked Conversations. At that time, you admonished me not to “overrate” blogging.You said it was just “another milestone on the corporate communications continuum.” Looking back at it now, do you think blogging was just what you said it was, or is it something bigger?

It’s important not to confuse the tool and
the effect it has had. The blog tool itself – a lightweight content management
system that produces items in reverse-chronological order and allows readers to
comment – simplified and improved  what earlier online tools did. In that
respect, blogs were a logical evolution of earlier online tools.

On the other hand, if
I didn’t think the uses to which organizations can put them weren’t important,
I never would have co-authored Blogging for Business!

Still, I must say that business has not
embraced blogging to the degree it should. The dearth of blogs by Fortune 500
companies, and the overall percentage of blogs among businesses, indicate that blogging is still in early-adopter mode.

Further, most companies that have blogs aren’t
using them well. Forrester’s research notes that corporate blogs are very, very
low on the scale of communications trusted by customers.

This has nothing to do
with the tool and everything to do with the ways they are being used. Many
corporate blogs continue to serve as channels for traditional communication
rather than authentic conversation. These are the blogs that breed distrust.
Between organizations that use blogs in this manner, and those that don’t use
them at all, I’d suggest that if blogs are going to have a significant impact
on business at large, it’ll happen sometime in the future. It hasn’t happened
yet, despite the fact that blogs have had a significant impact on some
companies (GM and Dell leap to mind).

There are exceptions, of course, and the
exceptions get the attention – as well they should. They demonstrate that
organizations can use blogs to improve transparency, to interact directly with
customers, to portray the company’s culture, to solicit feedback and input, and
to collaborate with audiences to solve problems.

It is my belief that every company should
have a blog, since it is the best tool to use when a rapid response is needed.

Finally, the blogs written by customers
provide insights companies would be downright irresponsible to ignore. These
same insights were available before blogs – through surveys, focus groups and
other channels – but blogs have dramatically simplified the process of keeping
a finger on the customer’s pulse.

So, yes, I continue to believe that blogs
were an evolutionary development from a software standpoint, but that their use
is vital to business.

How would you describe Twitter’s role on that
continuum? Does it much change the role of the corporate communicator?

Twitter introduced an entirely new model that has begun to have a
profound impact on communications.

Some would argue that the real-time
monitoring capability is significant. While I believe it’s important, companies
and communicators should always be monitoring any source of information that
will help them make better decisions, react quickly to challenges and better serve
their constituents, from customers to shareholders.

Others argue that business’s leap into
Twitter as a marketing channel demonstrates its importance. But business will
tap into any new channel where their customers and influencers are. Again, I
think some of the innovative uses to which Twitter is being put are exciting,
but finding innovative ways to capture attention in new channels is marketing’s
job, isn’t it?

Still others will discuss the connection that’s
possible between companies and customers. That connection was available on
blogs, and even on message boards before that. Twitter takes this to a new
level (as Zappos demonstrates) that is exciting and full of potential. But it’s
still a logical advance along the continuum.

The biggest change to communications wrought
by Twitter is the introduction of what I’ve been calling “the 140-character
news cycle.” The speed with which news and rumors can spread has accelerated
beyond anybody’s expectations thanks largely to Twitter. We’re beginning to develop
a catalog of case studies: Motrin Moms, Amazon Fail, Domino’s Pizza.

Twitter has single-handedly redefined the
meaning of “news.” The communities on Twitter have an insatiable appetite for
updates when an event captures attention and builds momentum.

Organizations
that do not fill the 140-character news cycle with their own information will
be subject to secondary and tertiary sources of information occupying the void,
often with speculative information, messages based on the public’s risk-averse
nature or general distrust of institutions, or deliberate misinformation spread
by adversaries. Scott Monty’s ongoing infusion of information via Twitter during
the Ford Ranger Station situation is a perfect example of an organization
ensuring accurate and timely updates are available for people to talk about,
preventing the spread of incorrect and potentially harmful information.

I’ve been wondering lately about the
potential usefulness of a lifestream utility like Posterous to an organization.
Updates such as those Scott provided to Twitter could be added with a bit more
substance, while
maintaining a chronological record on Posterous where comments can be
aggregated.

In any case, organizations once had a luxury
of time before responding to events or updating ongoing activities during a
crisis. Messages could be crafted, reviewed, analyzed and revised. Today,
communicators need to respond far more quickly, which puts an entirely
different spin on crisis preparation.

Your website bio puts some emphasis on your
abilities to help companies use online resources in a crisis. How important has
social media become in crisis management. Can you share an anecdote of
something you’ve done for a client in this area?

As I said, the nature of crisis communication has undergone a change that is
among the most significant companies must address resulting from social media.

Interestingly, the fundamentals of crises
have not changed at all. These include:

  • The public is risk-averse
  • The public attaches little credibility to
    business advocates
  • The media’s role is based on conflict
  • Advocacy groups will exploit your crisis to
    their own ends
  • Emotion, not logic, is at issue. If you engage
    in debate, you’ll be seen as defensive
  • Crises are characterized by symbols: dead
    birds in the Exxon Valdez crisis, stunned employees carrying boxes of their
    possessions out of Enron headquarters, overturned Ford
    Explorers in the Explorer/Firestone Tire crisis.
  • Organizational goals are also unchanged: to
    present and maintain a positive image, preserve constituent support, address
    mis-perceptions and misinformation and, ultimately, survive the crisis.

Finally, core crisis strategies remain
unchanged from pre-social media days:

  • Respond quickly, accurately, professionally,
    and with care
  • Be transparent and accessible
  • Treat perceptions as fact
  • Acknowledge mistakes and address how you will
    avoid a repeat of the situation in the future
  • Tailor messages to address the aggrieved
    party
  • Acknowledge and respect the other side’s
    concerns
  • Make no public confrontations
  • Emphasize existing relationships

Given that these fundamentals remain
unchanged, it is critical for organizations to acknowledge what has changed.
Crises erupt with unprecedented speed. Anyone can break news. And the
bo
boundaries between mainstream media – once (by necessity) the channel for
getting your information to the public – and social media have become very
porous.

With employees engaged in social media –
whether companies like it or not – they also become voices during a crisis. So
organizations need to recognize that achieving their goals and executing their
strategies require new approaches and a thorough understanding of the new
environment.

Again, speed and frequency of response are critical. Keeping
employees updated is also vital. Knowing in advance where your audiences are
online is important. Knowing who will interact with those audiences and
ensuring that individual (or individuals) is empowered to act without endless
rounds of approval is equally important – which means training and preparation before
a crisis hits is also a requirement. Far too few companies have crisis plans. Those that do have them rarely update them to account for these changes, and even
fewer companies drill their crisis plans.

As for my own experience, I recall one client
who was under attack by a competitor using misinformation to draw business
away. I got then to monitor discussions of the issue among
customers so they could correct misinformation, which a customer might inadvertently
be spreading. I also had them create a quick-and-dirty
WordPress site
that listed the allegations of the competitor and offered the truth. It was easy
to update and easy to point people – media, influencers, and customers – to the
site during online, phone, or face-to-face conversations.


[Adventure Girl Stefanie Michaels]


I don’t pay much attention to celebrities in social media. I don’t condemn them, but
overall they just don’t much interest me. Usually they lack many
characteristics–authenticity, conversational approach, transparency that have
made me such a champion of social media, particularly Twitter.

Stefanie
Michaels, who you may recognize as Adventure
Girl
in Twitterville is among the very few notable exceptions. She clearly
is tweeting herself and is remarkable up close and personal with many of her
followers. She participates in community events and causes and is obviously
informed on conversational issues in Twitter. This may explain why she has more
than 1 million followers.

Her book, Adventure Girl’s Guide to Adventure Travel…without
Breaking a Nail
, was released earlier this year and she seems to be trending toward more adventeros excursions. Earlier this year, she braved sub-zero  weather to participate in the Alaskan Iditarod dog sled race.
One month later, Michaels defied gravity  when she, along with astronaut Buzz Aldrin, participated in
the inaugural flight of Las Vegas’ Zero G, an airplane ride that lets
passengers experience zero gravity.

Here are her answers to my questions:


Obviously you were bitten by a travel bug early in life.  Did you start young?

YES! My first plane trip was at 6 months old and everyone
said I squealed with joy and giggled the whole flight to Chicago. My parents
said they knew I’d have a career on a plane… little did they know, I’d
practically live on them.

What experiences got you addicted to travel?

Meeting new people, seeing new places, touching unique
things- nurturing my senses. Addiction is only part of it!   If I am
home too long, I get antsy and grouching. I always say that the jet fuel I
smell when I get to airport gives me butterflies. I am off to have an adventure
filled with diverse people, places and experiences.

It’s an addiction because it’s my “book” in life- it’s how I
learn about the world. If I am not traveling, I’m stagnant in life in a way,
I’m not learning or growing. It’s my passion to ever change, grow and evolve.

StefCamelEgypt

[Seeing the pyramids the old fashioned way.]

When, how & why did you decide to make travel an
essential component to your career?

Really, they say if you do what you love, it will come to
you. I didn’t go out seeking travel as a career, it found me.

I did however know the moment I wanted to be a journalist,
the night in 1989, when the Berlin Wall was torn down. I was a kid, glued to the TV and I
wanted to be there telling people’s stories. I also dreamed of being a war
correspondent. I guess I’ve always wanted to be where news happened and where
the action was. Travel encompasses all that.


You came to social media from the celebrity business model. You were a
model, then a TV personality before stepping into Twitterville, blogging and
video.

My parents were in the entertainment business. My uncle was
an actor. He took me in when I was a toddler to his agent and they signed me on
the spot. I was so hyper, and bouncing around and dancing, that the agent
thought I’d be great for commercials. Within a month I had booked my first car
commercial. From there I moved into modeling and television. The modeling I
hated, but used it as a launching pad, thus using my name to create my own
promotional company.

When I was modeling, I developed an idea I called, “Travel Partners,” which used email to take my fans with me on locations, where I was doing all this great cool
stuff as a spokesperson.

I’m told I launched one of the first 1500 commercial websites
on line- , and began bringing people along with me to cool locations
around the globe with my film crew. We aired the snippets online. I was
“blogging” daily from location at the time, but then the term was not “coined”-
we called it daily updates from location. That’s also where my fans called me
“Adventure Girl” for the first time. It stuck, so Travel Partners eventually became AdventureGirl.com.

I guess I’ve always done it, shared my experiences, so
falling into social media was the next step in my techno-geek-ism. (My secret dream is to write code) After trying
MySpace, then Facebook, I found Twitter most gratifying. It’s just brilliant
all around, and especially if you “get it”.

[Steflongneck

[Getting sized up by Burmese refugee women in Chiang Mai village, Thailand.]

Why did you decide to try social media?

I’m a journalist at heart, so I am always reading and
looking for ways to communicate. I have been writing online for
several years, but fell in love with
Twitter because of it’s simplicity and “now” real time media advantages. It
took me about six months to get @AdventureGirl out of a squatters hands, so when
I got it, I was all about communicating and learning about it at warp speed.

Twitter has revolutionized the way we send and receive
media. It’s the “new internet” and I saw this straight away. I wanted to be a
part of it.


How has Twitter worked out for you so far?

I was hooked in the first minute. I have never felt more at
home online than I do when I am on Twitter. I have made so many new like-minded
friends, forged relationships I never would have, had it not been for Twitter. I
don’t think you find this with Facebook or MySpace- they are more insular.


With over one million followers, you are one of the 100 most popular
tweeters. Who are these followers?

They are everyday you-and-mes. I even have followers who
are animals- lizards, dogs, cats, which I love because they make me laugh.
Diversity in life, diversity in my friends on Twitter. I love it!

Everyone thinks of me as this celebrity, but in reality, I’m just a girl working, like everyone following me. There is nothing
glamorous about me in my pajamas with zit creme and tweeting!


How do those ‘everyday you-and-me’ folk help you make a living?

Twitter for me is not about “making money.” It’s about
passing around knowledge, information and connecting. However, it does open me
up to meeting companies and entities that see Adventure Girl-the brand as
adding potential value to what they are doing. Indirectly, it is a great source
for connections, thus business opportunities may come to me because I am on
Twitter.

How has social media changed your image and you?

Social media has given me a platform to share information
that was/is important to me. I don’t need to “hide” behind publicists or
agents, and I can be silly and show I am this real person.

It also inspires me. People like @drew who I learn from
everyday or @invisiblepeople – a former homeless man who is putting a face to
homelessness with a video camera and stories. I think that’s what is most
important to me and I hope it’s made me a better person just knowing them and
passing on their messages.

What is the most important thing you’ve learned from social
media?

To engage, communicate, and NOT sell your agenda. To be pure,
show concern, to be a real person who cares. I have also learned that so many
people don’t get that. That’s why I love “block.” I don’t want to see your
spam. Also, listening. Your followers will let you know what they like,
what they don’t and they do it in real time.

You are much more conversational on Twitter than most other so-called
celebrity tweeters. Why have you chosen to spend the time and energy. How has
that helped you professionally?

What’s the point of “being social” and partaking in social
media, if: A. You’re not going to be social; and B. You hire people to do it for you.
Celebrities that do this are missing out. It’s  “old media,” and that
way of thinking is obsolete.

You can see the forward thinking celebs like MC Hammer, who
have embraced the power of having their own voice. We as celebs have fought for
this for so long, now there is a platform set up where we can have a voice. Why
give that power away?

I take the time and spend the energy because like any
relationship, it enriches me both spiritually and emotionally, give and take.
There was a trending topic recently called #twittercrush. People were naming
actors, athletes, musicians… I named “Twitter”.

Professionally speaking, by just engaging, communicating, it
indirectly helps me professionally because what you see if what you get, and a
lot of companies seem to be attracted to this.

For the benefit of my studio audience, can you share an adventure you’ve
experienced where social media played a role?

Sure, Operation Smile, the organization that helps children
with facial deformities receive life-changing surgeries, came to me one day through
Twitter
. They asked if I wanted to go on a mission with their doctors to help
kids who were going for their surgeries. I stepped back, cried A LOT, and then
got back to them with a “yes.”

What they did not know is that my brother had a cleft lip
and had died (unrelated cause) before he got his surgery. It was a tragic loss
for my parents- they grieved quietly, burned his photos and never spoke of him
again. I found out via an aunt when I was 11 about him.

Together with Renee Hamilton, their social media guru, we
came up with the 140smiles.org campaign-
and I became their Twitter Smile Ambassador, raising money for 140 kids in 140
characters- one smile at a time. It gives me the chance to honor my brother and
shed a light on this important charity.

Now, TwestivalSF< will honor 140Smiles in the global
Twestival event and I’ll be able to help even more children through this social
media fundraiser. I am humbled and honored.

What advice do you have for someone who wants to enhance a personal business
position by using social media?

DON’T Talk about business. That will come as people get to
know you and you them, trust is formed and there is interest. I want to know
who you are Mr. CEO of company X- not what you are selling. Are you even a real
person who cares? That’s the best piece of advice I can share. Be real. Don’t
sell: share.

Back before the Beijing Olympics, when the world’s media was filled with news of anti-China protests, a Singapore-born documentary producer, named Tan Siok Siok who lives part of her life in that huge and complex city, produced a documentary film called Boomtown Beijing [link just to trailer].

Boomtown told a different story then the one on stage center. It depicted everyday people of Beijing, people who had nothing to do with the issues fomenting protest.

Tan captured the excitement, spirit and aspirations of people who lived there and were just proud that for the first time ever, the whole world was coming for a visit. The controversies, were not part of the stories of these people.

I met Tan when I was in China, she is understated, passionate, perceptive and generous. And now she has turned her considerable talents to a new story, one that interests me even more than China. Her Her new film, Twittamentary looks at how
lives connect and intersect within the Twitter community.

And for those of you who spend time in Twitterville, well, this is your chance to be a movie star. Tan wants you to contribute video clips to Twittamentary. Get in front of a video camera and tell your best story about Twitter and you. Tell a story or talk about what Twitter means to you or why you think Twitter matters then upload it here.

To me, what really is interesting is that from the comfort of your own home, or while sitting in front of a webcam or smartphone, wherever you are in the world you can be part of a digital film being produced from China.

This, seems to me, expands the definition of Global Neighborhoods.